Title
Lamen vs. Director, Bureau of Corrections
Case
G.R. No. 117078
Decision Date
Feb 22, 1995
Willy Bagawe, convicted for selling 13.6g marijuana, sought release via habeas corpus after *People vs. Simon* reduced penalties. SC granted release, applying retroactive favorable penal laws.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 117078)

Facts of the Case

Willy Bagawe y Pagalla was convicted for violating Section 4, Article II of R.A. No. 6425, which addresses the sale and delivery of marijuana. His conviction mandated a life sentence and a P20,000 fine due to his possession of controlled substances, specifically a total of 13.6 grams of marijuana. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision on April 7, 1992, which became final on May 11, 1992. Since his arrest on April 14, 1987, Bagawe has been serving time in the New Bilibid Prisons.

Legal Arguments

The petitioners argue that, in light of the ruling in People vs. Simon, the maximum penalty for Bagawe should be recalibrated to two years, four months, and one day of prision correccional rather than the life sentence initially imposed. They assert that Bagawe, having served over six years, is entitled to release. Conversely, the Office of the Solicitor General concurs with the application of the Simon decision but proposes a different calculation of the penalty, suggesting an indeterminate sentence of six months to six years of prision correccional, in alignment with precedents set in Simon and People vs. Saycon.

Application of the Law

Under Article 22 of the Revised Penal Code, penal provisions that favor the accused are retroactive provided the accused is not a habitual offender. R.A. No. 7659 is deemed beneficial for Willy Bagawe, allowing the application of more lenient penalties post-conviction. The appropriate penalty, according to the modified law, would have been a sentence ranging from six months of arresto mayor to four years and two months of prision correccional after applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law.

Court's Conclusion

Despite the finality of the original judicial decision against Willy Bagawe, the Supreme Court determines that the writ of habeas corpus can be utilized for individuals who have served a term exceeding the maximum penalty that could have been correctly imposed under favorable law. The

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.