Title
Lacson, Jr. vs. Posadas
Case
A.M. No. 74-MJ
Decision Date
Jul 30, 1976
Judge Posadas failed to comply with Election Code procedures, violating Section 136; despite good faith and amnesty, he was admonished for neglecting electoral safeguards.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 175210)

Petitioner and Respondent

Petitioner: Salvador Lacson, Jr.
Respondent: Ramon Posadas, Municipal Judge, Talisay, Negros Occidental

Key Dates

– Petitions for inclusion filed: October 14–19, 1971
– Investigation report issued: July 17, 1972
– Supreme Court resolution promulgated: July 30, 1976

Applicable Law and Constitutional Basis

Since the decision date falls before 1990, the 1973 Philippine Constitution guides the analysis. The primary statutory reference is Section 136 of the Election Code of 1971, which prescribes procedural requirements for applications to include or reinstate a voter’s name in the permanent list. Presidential Decree No. 433 (April 8, 1974) later granted general amnesty for certain election-law infractions.

Nature of the Complaint

Lacson charged Posadas with:
a. Ignorance of the law
b. Partiality
c. Violation of Section 136, Election Code of 1971

Findings of the Executive Judge

The Executive Judge found no factual basis for ignorance of law or partiality. He concluded, however, that Posadas failed to require petitioners to attach a certification from the relevant Board of Inspectors confirming refusal of registration and proper service of notice—a clear violation of Section 136.

Requirements under Section 136, Election Code of 1971

Section 136 mandates that a petitioner attach:

  1. A certification by the Election Registration Board or Board of Inspectors regarding the refusal of registration;
  2. Proof of service of the application and notice of hearing on a board member;
  3. Submission outside the blackout periods before regular or special elections.

Procedural Shortcomings and Hasty Proceedings

Posadas admitted reliance solely on petitioners’ testimonies and on notice served only on the Election Registration Board, omitting the Board of Inspectors’ certification. He reset inclusion hearings with insufficient notice—sometimes the morning after filing—precluding proper attendance by inspectors. This lack of procedural rigor allowed summary default orders for indiscriminate inclusion, many of which were later reversed on appeal.

Legal Principles on Voter Enrollment and Public Trust

Under prevailing constitutional and jurisprudential principles, the exercise of suffrage is a public trust. Enrollment or exclusion from the voter list affects not only individual rights but the integrity of the electoral process. Compliance with procedural safeguards is essential even in summary election cases to prevent abuses.

Impact of Amnesty under Presidentia

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.