Title
Labo, Jr. vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 105111
Decision Date
Jul 3, 1992
Ramon Labo, Jr., disqualified as mayor due to lack of Filipino citizenship, despite winning election; vice-mayor declared successor, not runner-up Ortega.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 105111)

Applicable Law (1987 Constitution Basis)

  • Natural-born Filipino citizenship is required for elective public office (1987 Const., Art. VI, Sec. 10; Art. X, Sec. 44).
  • Omnibus Election Code Secs. 78; Comelec Rules, Rule 39, Sec. 3 – decisions on candidacy become final after five days unless stayed by the Supreme Court.
  • Local Government Code Sec. 39 – elective local officials must be Filipino citizens.
  • Local Government Code Sec. 44 – vice-mayor succeeds to mayor in case of permanent vacancy.

Chronology of Proceedings

  • March 23 & 25, 1992: Labo and Ortega file certificates of candidacy.
  • March 26, 1992: Ortega petitions Comelec to cancel Labo’s certificate for false citizenship claim.
  • May 4, 1992: Comelec hearing; Ortega presents this Court’s 1989 decision declaring Labo not a Filipino citizen. Labo offers no evidence.
  • May 9, 1992: Comelec cancels Labo’s certificate of candidacy.
  • May 10 & 13, 1992: Comelec clarifies decision’s executory effect and suspends Labo’s proclamation pending finality.
  • May 15, 1992: Labo files petition for certiorari (GR No. 105111) to set aside Comelec’s disqualification; Ortega files mandamus petition (GR No. 105384) to implement the cancellation.
  • May 14, 1992: Comelec resolution becomes final and executory (five-day period lapsed without Supreme Court stay).
  • June 16, 1992: Supreme Court considers both petitions submitted for decision.

Issue I: Labo’s Citizenship and Comelec’s Disqualification

Labo contends he has reacquired Philippine citizenship and faults abbreviated Comelec proceedings. He relies on U.S. precedent requiring proof of expatriating intent. The Court notes:

  • Labo failed to present any evidence of Philippine citizenship reacquisition, whether by legislative act, naturalization, or repatriation under PD 725/LOI 270.
  • His mere application for repatriation remains pending and does not effectuate citizenship.
  • This Court’s 1989 ruling that Labo is not a Filipino citizen remains binding (res judicata).
  • Comelec afforded Labo due process with multiple summons and hearing dates; delay was attributable to Labo’s non-compliance.

Ruling: Comelec did not commit grave abuse of discretion. Labo remains an alien and is disqualified from candidacy. His certificate of candidacy was properly canceled.

Issue II: Finality of Comelec Resolution

Ortega argues that Comelec’s May 9 resolution became final and executory five days after receipt (May 14), entitling him to mandate implementation. The Court agrees that no Supreme Court stay was issued within the five-day period; thus, Comelec’s disqualification order is final and binding.

Issue III: Proclamation of Next Highest Vote-Getter

Ortega claims that, with Labo’s votes excluded, he as second placer should be declared mayor. The Court rejects this:

  • Votes cast for a candidate presumed qualified at election cannot be treated as void or stray.
  • The electorate voted for Labo in good faith; their franchise cannot be nullif

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.