Title
La Vista Association, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 95252
Decision Date
Sep 5, 1997
A dispute over Mangyan Road's right-of-way between La Vista, Ateneo, and Loyola Grand Villas led to a Supreme Court ruling affirming a voluntary easement established by mutual agreement among predecessors.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 165266)

Key Dates

• July 1, 1949 – Deed of Sale with Mortgage (Tuasons→Philippine Building Corp.)
• December 7, 1951 – Deed of Assignment (Phil. Building Corp.→Ateneo)
• June 6, 1952 – Sale of western portion to Maryknoll
• 1976 – Ateneo’s subdivision plans; La Vista’s offer and conditioning of easement extinguishment; Ateneo’s sale to Solid Homes, Inc.
• December 17, 1976 – Solid Homes, Inc. files for injunction
• November 20, 1987 – RTC decision recognizing easement
• April 20, 1988 – SC dismisses preliminary injunction appeal as moot
• September 21, 1989 – CA resolution enforces right-of-way, denies contempt motions
• May 22, 1990 – CA decision (Second Division) affirms RTC on merits
• June 22, 1998 – SC final decision affirming CA

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (decision date post-1990)
• New Civil Code: Articles 619, 625 (Voluntary easement); Article 1306 (Autonomy of contract)
• Rules of Court: Rule 58 (preliminary vs. final injunctions), Rule 19 (intervention)

Factual Background

  1. Boundaries Established by Contract
    • The 1949 Deed of Sale mandated a 15 m roadway as boundary: 7.5 m from vendor (Tuasons) and 7.5 m from vendee (Philippine Building Corp.).
    • The 1951 assignment to Ateneo incorporated all obligations, including the 7.5 m dedication.
  2. Early Encroachments and Settlements
    • Maryknoll’s 1952 wall encroached half the roadway; Tuasons sued and Maryknoll restored full width.
    • Ateneo erected a boundary wall instead of roadway improvements.
  3. 1976 Developments and Sale to Solid Homes
    • La Vista acknowledged mutual easements in correspondence but conditioned any purchase on their extinguishment.
    • Ateneo’s public sale to Solid Homes, Inc. expressly transferred right-of-way privileges, subjecting development and maintenance costs to the buyer.
  4. Obstruction and Litigation
    • La Vista installed concrete posts and barred Loyola residents from using Mangyan Road.
    • Solid Homes destroyed barriers, prompting mutual contempt threats and Solid Homes’ suit for injunctive relief.

Procedural History

• Trial Court (RTC Br. 89) granted final injunction (Nov 20, 1987), declaring an easement in favor of Solid Homes and awarding attorney’s fees.
• IAC nullified the preliminary injunction (May 31, 1985) but SC later deemed that moot.
• CA (First motion resolution, Sept 21, 1989) enforced unobstructed passage and denied contempt motions; Second Division (May 22, 1990) affirmed the RTC on merits.
• SC (June 22, 1998) dismissed pending petitions as moot or lacking abuse of discretion and affirmed CA’s judgment on the merits.

Issue

Does a valid voluntary easement of right-of-way exist over Mangyan Road in favor of Solid Homes, Inc., and its successors, enforceable against La Vista and Ateneo?

Legal Analysis

  1. Nature of Easement
    • A voluntary easement arises from the manifest will of parties by agreement.
    • The 1949 Deed of Sale, 1951 Assignment, 1976 sale to Solid Homes and related correspondence conclusively demonstrate the parties’ intention to create reciprocal rights of passage.
  2. Preliminary vs. Final Injunction
    • Preliminary injunctions are interlocutory and based on incomplete evidence; final injunctions follow a merits trial and constitute a judgment under Rule 58, Section 10.
    • Prior SC decisions on preliminary injunctions did not preclude litigation of the merits in this case; res judicata attaches only upon final, on-the-merits judgments.
  3. Extinguishment and Necessity
    • Voluntary easements endure beyond extinguished necessity or alternat





...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.