Title
La Fuerza, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-24069
Decision Date
Jun 28, 1968
A dispute arose when La Fuerza refused to pay for a defective conveyor system installed by Associated Engineering. The Supreme Court ruled La Fuerza's rescission claim was barred by the six-month prescriptive period, favoring the plaintiff.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 229677)

Background and Proceedings

The case originated from an action for recovery of a sum of money filed by Associated Engineering Co. for the balance of the contract price regarding the conveyor systems. The initial judgment from the Court of First Instance favored La Fuerza, but this was later reversed by the Court of Appeals following a motion for reconsideration, which mandated La Fuerza to pay the remaining amount along with attorney's fees and interest.

Contract Negotiation and Execution

In January 1960, the manager of Associated Engineering, Antonio Co, approached Mariano Lim, the president of La Fuerza, proposing the installation of conveyor systems to enhance operational efficiency. The offer was formalized in writing on February 4, 1960. After some back-and-forth, the contract was agreed upon, including a down payment of P5,000 made by La Fuerza. Subsequently, the installation began, and two conveyor units valued at P13,250 were delivered.

Performance and Deficiencies

Despite the completion of the installation in May 1960 and several trial runs conducted through July 1960 with the participation of La Fuerza's management, the conveyor systems did not meet performance expectations. Issues arose, such as bottle collisions and sluggish operation, leading La Fuerza to assert that the systems were ineffective for their intended purpose.

Legal Claims and Defenses

La Fuerza's counterclaims included allegations that the installed conveyors did not meet the agreed specifications and warranties. Following their dissatisfaction with the product, La Fuerza sought to rescind the contract and demanded a refund of the down payment. However, the court found that La Fuerza's action for rescission was time-barred under Article 1571 of the Civil Code, which imposes a six-month limit for actions related to sales contracts after delivery.

Court of First Instance and Appeals

The Court of First Instance ruled in favor of La Fuerza, rescinding the contract and ordering the return of the down payment. However, the Court of Appeals later reversed this ruling, focusing on the statutory limitation in Article 1571. La Fuerza’s failure to pursue rescission within six months from the completion of installation in May 1960 was pivotal to the appellate court’s determination.

Legal Interpretation of Delivery and Acceptance

La Fuerza contended that delivery of the conveyor systems was contingent upon their acceptance and proper functioning. The court clarified that delivery, as per the Civil Code, is accomplished once the goo

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.