Case Summary (G.R. No. 150175)
Background Facts
Between June and August 1991, Albino Josef, who operated a shoe manufacturing business based in Marikina, issued 26 postdated checks to Agustin Alarilla, a leather supplier from Meycauayan, Bulacan. The checks were drawn against Josef's accounts at Associated Bank and Far East Bank & Trust Company. When Alarilla presented these checks for payment, they were dishonored due to insufficient funds associated with closed accounts. Despite Josef issuing a new set of checks in replacement, these were also dishonored, prompting Alarilla to file criminal complaints against him.
Trial and Conviction
The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bulacan found Josef guilty of 26 counts of violating BP 22, imposing a penalty of six months for each conviction. The RTC's ruling was based on the elements of the offense, which Josef admitted to. Josef's defenses included assertions that he had already paid the value of the checks in cash, challenging the admissibility of photocopies of the checks, and claiming he acted in good faith.
Dishonor of Checks
The elements necessary to prove a violation of BP 22 include the issuance of a check, knowledge of insufficient funds at the time of issuance, and the subsequent dishonor of the check by the drawee bank. The court found that all elements were established in the case. Josef's acknowledgment of having issued the checks and their eventual dishonor sufficed to support the prosecution's claims.
Admissibility of Evidence
Josef contested the admission of photocopies of the dishonored checks, referencing the Best Evidence Rule, which generally requires the original document for evidence. However, both the RTC and Court of Appeals determined that the photocopies were admissible. Josef implicitly recognized the checks were in his possession, thus curing any potential flaws in the prosecution's evidence. The photocopies were deemed faithful representations of the original documents.
Good Faith Defense
Josef's claim of good faith was found to be irrelevant to the offenses under BP 22, which is classified as malum prohibitum, meaning the act itself constitutes an offense regardless of intent or good faith. The law is stringent regarding the issuance of bad checks, and whether malice or intent was present does not mitigate the offense.
Imposition of Penalty
Josef argued that under Administrative Circular No. 12-2000, a fine rather than imprisonment should be the penalty for violations of BP 22, especially for first-time offenders. However, the court affirmed that the imp
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 150175)
Case Overview
- This case involves a petition for review on certiorari of a decision rendered by the Court of Appeals.
- The petitioner, Albino Josef, was convicted of 26 counts of violating Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 (BP 22), also known as the Anti-Bouncing Checks Law.
- The decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Malolos, Bulacan, which convicted Josef, was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
Background of the Case
- From June to August 1991, petitioner Albino Josef, a shoe manufacturer and seller based in Marikina, issued 26 postdated checks to Agustin Alarilla, a seller of leather products.
- The checks were drawn against Josef's accounts at the Associated Bank and Far East Bank & Trust Company.
- Upon presentation, the checks were dishonored due to the accounts being closed. Alarilla notified Josef and demanded payment.
- Following negotiations, Josef issued replacement postdated checks, which were also subsequently dishonored.
Procedural History
- Alarilla filed criminal complaints against Josef for the violations of BP 22, leading to 26 Informations filed with the RTC.
- The trial court convicted Josef on all counts, imposing a penalty of six months imprisonment for each conviction.
- Josef appealed to the Court of Appeals, which upheld the trial court's decision.
Petitioner’s Claims and Defenses
- Josef admitted issuing the 26 dishonored chec