Title
Supreme Court
Jinon vs. Jiz
Case
A.C. No. 9615
Decision Date
Mar 5, 2013
Atty. Jiz suspended for 2 years for neglecting client Gloria Jinon’s case, misappropriating P45,000, and failing to account for funds, violating professional ethics.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 9615)

Allegations Against Respondent

Gloria accused Atty. Jiz of neglecting her case, misappropriating funds, and assigning her legal matter to another attorney without her consent. Gloria claimed that after entrusting Atty. Jiz with the title recovery and other legal services, he failed to keep her informed of her case’s status and retained funds intended for specific purposes without providing proper accounting or return upon her request.

Sequence of Events

Initially, Gloria paid Atty. Jiz an acceptance fee of P17,000 and an additional P45,000 for expenses related to the transfer of TCT No. T-119598. Atty. Jiz later informed her that another lawyer was handling the matter. Gloria further discovered that Atty. Jiz was collecting rental income from the Leganes Property but provided her with only a portion of those funds. After several demands for returning her funds and terminating his services, Gloria initiated an administrative complaint against Atty. Jiz.

Atty. Jiz's Defense

In response, Atty. Jiz admitted to taking on Gloria's case but contended that his obligations were limited to protecting her legal rights. He disputed the allegations of misappropriation and claimed he had provided adequate legal services. Atty. Jiz maintained that any fees not returned were justified as payment for legal services rendered based on Gloria's prior payment and alleged negotiations regarding her property.

Action and Investigation

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) reviewed the case and found that Atty. Jiz had indeed failed to update Gloria about her case and neglected to fulfill his responsibilities per the Code of Professional Responsibility. The IBP recommended that Atty. Jiz refund the amount of P45,000 to Gloria and be reprimanded for his conduct.

Court Ruling

The Court upheld the IBP's findings, affirming that Atty. Jiz was remiss in his duties by neglecting to act on Gloria's case and improperly handling her funds. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining a high standard of diligence and trustworthiness in the legal profession. The respondent's lack of action, combined with his failure to comply with legal directives, led to a determination that he had committed grave lapses in professional conduct.

Penalty Imposed

The Court decided to suspend Atty. Jiz from practic

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.