Title
Jebsens Maritime, Inc. vs. Alcibar
Case
G.R. No. 221117
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2019
Seaman Alcibar contracted colon cancer due to poor dietary provisions on board; Supreme Court ruled compensable, affirming disability benefits despite expired contract.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 234323)

Applicable Law

This case is governed by:

  • The 1987 Philippine Constitution
  • 2000 Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) Amended Standard Terms and Conditions Governing the Employment of Filipino Seafarers
  • Relevant collective bargaining agreement (CBA)

Factual Background

On March 5, 2010, Jebsens Maritime, Inc. hired Alcibar as an ordinary seaman for nine months following his pre-employment medical examination, which declared him fit for work. Alcibar was deployed to the M/V Maritime Victory. He later reported experiencing poor meal quality that he believed contributed to his health decline. By February 2011, he experienced severe symptoms leading to a diagnosis of internal hemorrhoids in Canada, and upon repatriation, he sought medical assistance in the Philippines being subsequently diagnosed with colon cancer.

Allegations and Claims

Alcibar filed a complaint seeking permanent disability compensation, sickness allowance, damages, and attorney’s fees. He alleged that his illness was work-related and attributable to poor dietary provisions aboard the vessel which comprised high-fat and low-fiber foods—factors thought to elevate the risk of colon cancer.

Procedural History

The Labor Arbiter favored Alcibar, ruling the illness compensable under prevailing jurisprudence due to the dietary factors contributing to his condition. However, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed this decision, asserting that colon cancer was not work-related and that Alcibar failed to comply with the mandatory post-employment medical examination protocol. The Court of Appeals (CA) later ruled in favor of Alcibar, reinstating the Labor Arbiter’s decisions and underscoring the presumption of compensability for colon cancer.

Supreme Court's Examination of Compensability

The Supreme Court upheld the CA’s ruling, determining Alcibar's entitlement to disability benefits and sickness pay based on several findings:

  1. Compliance with Contractual Obligations: The Court highlighted Alcibar's compliance with the requirements set forth in the POEA contract and found that the petitioners failed to act on their responsibility to schedule the required post-employment medical examination after his repatriation.

  2. Nature of the Illness: The Court recognized colon cancer as a compensable work-related disease if substantial evidence establishes the work conditions aggravated the illness.

  3. Evidence Submission and Waiver of Rights: The Supreme Court affirmed that the liability of petitioners to provide medical examination and services was waived due to their negligence in addressing Alcibar’s post-employment proc

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.