Title
Javier y Titular vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 245334
Decision Date
Feb 8, 2023
A motorcyclist was acquitted after the Supreme Court ruled the prosecution failed to establish an unbroken chain of custody for a folding knife allegedly found during his arrest, creating reasonable doubt.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 245334)

Key Dates

June 1, 2016 – Arrest and confiscation of the folding knife.
June 2, 2016 – Filing of Information for violation of BP 881, Section 261(p).
March 22, 2017 – RTC decision finding petitioner guilty.
August 31, 2018 – CA Decision affirming RTC.
February 14, 2019 – CA Resolution denying reconsideration.
February 8, 2023 – Supreme Court decision granting the petition.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article III, Section 14(2) (presumption of innocence).
• Batas Pambansa Bilang 881, Section 261(p) (Omnibus Election Code), as amended by Section 32 of RA 7166.
• COMELEC Resolution No. 10015 (ban on firearms and deadly weapons during election period).
• 2011 PNP Criminal Investigation Manual (chain of custody and evidence handling).

Factual Background

During an “Oplan Sita” checkpoint in Barangay Poblacion, Muntinlupa City, police officers observed petitioner riding a motorcycle without a helmet and lacking license and plate number. Upon his detention, officers allegedly discovered a folding knife in the motorcycle compartment, marked “MRTJ,” photographed, and turned over to SPO4 Ty for safekeeping. A COMELEC certification confirmed no authorization for deadly weapons.

Trial Court Decision

The RTC found all elements of illegal possession of deadly weapons established: (1) possession of a folding knife during the election period; (2) carrying in public; and (3) absence of COMELEC authorization. Petitioner was sentenced to three to six years imprisonment, disqualification from public office, deprivation of suffrage, and forfeiture of the knife.

Court of Appeals Decision

The CA affirmed the RTC, holding the arrest lawful and the knife admissible. It added that petitioner, having pleaded without challenging his arrest, was estopped from contesting evidence legality. The CA also rejected arguments on exemption from the COMELEC ban.

Issue

Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that petitioner committed illegal possession of a deadly weapon under Section 261(p) of BP 881, as amended.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

The petition is GRANTED. The CA Decision and Resolution are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Petitioner is ACQUITTED for failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Analysis on Chain of Custody

The Court applied the 2011 PNP Manual’s requirements for marking, preservation, and continuity of custody:

  1. Marking must include exhibit case number, collector’s signature, time, date, and location. Only initials “MRTJ” were noted.
  2. No testimony on preservation measures or packaging separate from other evidence.
  3. Absence of a documentary chain of custody form; no accounting of every person handling the knife.
  4. Marking occurred at the station rather than at the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.