Title
Javellana vs. La Paz Ice Plant and Cold Storage Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 45163
Decision Date
Oct 26, 1936
Elpidio Javellana sought to install an additional ice-producing unit to meet demand, opposed by La Paz Ice Plant. The Public Service Commission approved, upheld by the Supreme Court, citing public interest and regulatory limits.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 116896)

Relevant Facts

Elpidio Javellana, the sole owner and operator of an ice plant in Iloilo, has been authorized by the Public Service Commission to produce 10 tons of ice daily. However, the existing two producing units have a diminished capacity of 5 to 6 tons due to wear and tear and insufficient water supply from the Iloilo River. Javellana seeks to install an additional ice-producing unit with a capacity of 4 to 5 tons, which would operate using an electric motor, thereby not relying on the water supply.

In contrast, La Paz Ice Plant maintains that it produces around 30 tons of ice daily, which they argue is adequate for the local demand. They contended that Javellana's current units could be repaired to restore a greater production capacity, though more costly than installing a new unit.

Errors Assigned by the Appellant

The appellant, La Paz Ice Plant, asserts that the Public Service Commission erred in granting Javellana the authority to install the new production unit, overruling their opposition, and denying their motion for a new trial. These claims rely heavily on the premise that the approval could exacerbate market competition and lead to overproduction, which they argue would contravene the public interest.

Public Service Commission's Findings

The Public Service Commission concluded that approving Javellana’s application would enhance public interests appropriately, considering the evidence provided. The Commission noted that Javellana's current ice production was insufficient to meet the local demand, which had compelled him to withdraw incompletely formed ice blocks from the refrigerating tanks to satisfy urgent needs, thereby asserting a legitimate market need for his proposed expansion.

Legal Considerations and Conclusion

The Court, emphasizing the principle that i

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.