Title
Supreme Court
Javarez vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 248729
Decision Date
Sep 3, 2020
A public school teacher was acquitted of child abuse charges for pushing a student but convicted of slight physical injuries for hitting another with a broomstick, lacking intent to demean under RA 7610.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 248729)

Petitioner and Respondent

Petitioner: Joel C. Javarez
Respondent: People of the Philippines

Key Dates

February 7, 2008 – Alleged incidents of physical abuse
April 10, 2014 – Trial Court conviction and sentencing
September 14, 2018 – Court of Appeals affirmance and modification of damages
September 3, 2020 – Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

1987 Philippine Constitution (post-1990 decision)
Republic Act No. 7610, Section 10(a) and Section 31(e)
Revised Penal Code, Article 266(2) on slight physical injuries
Civil Code, Article 2219(1) on moral damages

Factual Background

On the morning of February 7, 2008, during a review class for the National Admission Test, BBB asked a classmate for “pop rice,” sparking a fight. Petitioner intervened and struck BBB’s left cheek with a broomstick handle. In the afternoon session, AAA observed a dispute over food; petitioner approached and pushed AAA in the chest, causing him to fall face-first. Both minors reported pain and were examined at Brooke’s Point Hospital, where medico-legal certificates documented tenderness in AAA’s chest area and abrasions and hematoma on BBB’s face and ear.

Trial Court Proceedings and Ruling

Petitioner pleaded not guilty. The trial court credited the minors’ direct and consistent testimonies, corroborated by medical findings, and found no ill motive for their accusations. On April 10, 2014, it convicted petitioner of two counts of child abuse under RA 7610, imposing maximum penalties under Section 31(e) and awarding P10,000 civil indemnity and P10,000 damages to each child.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

Petitioner challenged the credibility of prosecution witnesses and offered alternative explanations (a cockfight injury). The Court of Appeals, in a September 14, 2018 decision, upheld the convictions under Section 10(a), Article VI of RA 7610, clarified that proof of prejudice to the child is not required when liability is based on any act of abuse, and increased moral and exemplary damages to P20,000 each. Reconsideration was denied on June 20, 2019.

Issues on Supreme Court Review

Whether petitioner’s acts fell within RA 7610’s definition of child abuse requiring specific intent to debase, degrade, or demean a child’s intrinsic dignity, and if not, whether the acts qualify as slight physical injuries under the Revised Penal Code.

SC’s Analysis on RA 7610 Liability

Child abuse under RA 7610 Section 10(a) demands proof of actual intent to debase, degrade, or demean a child’s dignity. Citing Bongalon v. People and Jabalde y Jamandron v. People, the Court held that petitioner’s interventions aimed solely at halting student fights, without any demonstrable intent to humiliate AAA or BBB. Consequently, petitioner cannot be held liable under RA 7610 for either incident.

SC’s Analysis on Revised Penal Code Liability

Under RPC Article 266(2), slight physical injuries require malicious intent to inflict physical harm. BBB’s uncontradicted testimony and medical evidence of abrasions and hematoma established that petitioner maliciously struck him with a broomstick. There was no proof of incapacitation or need for medical attendance beyond docu


...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.