Title
Jacob vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 92159
Decision Date
Jul 1, 1993
Dispute over 794-sqm land in Albay; petitioners claimed ownership via 1933 deed, but SC upheld private respondents' Torrens title, citing indefeasibility, laches, and failure to oppose registration timely.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 92159)

Relevant Background

On November 12, 1984, the private respondents filed a complaint in the Regional Trial Court of Tabaco, Albay, seeking recovery of possession and ownership of the land previously owned by their grandparents, Agaton Boragay and Manuela Bobiles. The private respondents asserted their claim based on the Original Certificate of Title No. RO-3334 issued in 1932 in Manuela's name. The petitioners, Jacob and Jacob, were among eight defendants, with six being declared in default.

Claims of the Respondents

The private respondents argued that after the death of Agaton and Manuela, the property passed to their only child, Gregoria Boragay. The subsequent transfer of ownership led to the issuance of Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-50318 in 1977 in the name of the private respondents.

Petitioners' Counterclaims

In defense, the petitioners contended that the land had been transferred through an Escritura de Venta Con Pacto de Retro (Deed of Sale with Right to Repurchase) from Agaton and Manuela to Leon Cabida in 1933, followed by multiple sales concluding with the registration of the property in the name of the private respondents. They claimed continuous possession of the property since then, having paid taxes on it since 1948.

Judgment of the Trial Court

Judge Oscar B. Pimentel rendered a decision on August 8, 1986, upholding the petitioners' claims by dismissing the complaint of the private respondents. The ruling concluded that the petitioners were rightful possessors of the land based on their long-term occupancy and the aforementioned sales.

Court of Appeals' Reversal

Upon appeal by the private respondents, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision. Key findings included the validity of the Certificate of Title in the name of the private respondents, which served as conclusive proof of ownership. Moreover, the court emphasized that the petitioners never contested the title's validity during the statutory period, thus losing their right to challenge it.

Legal Principles in Land Registration

The Court of Appeals maintained that under the Torrens system of land registration, a Certificate of Title is deemed incontrovertible after one year from its issuance. The petitioners' failure to oppose the registration of TCT No. 50318 constituted a bar to their claims of ownership based on the Escritura de Venta Con Pacto de Retro, even assuming its legitimacy.

Petitioners' Arguments on Bad Faith and Laches

In their appeal, the petitioners argued that the private respondents acted in bad faith and should be barred from claiming ownership under the doctrine of laches due to their delayed action. The court noted, however, that any potential laches claim was undermined by the petitioners' i

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.