Title
Jacinto vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 162540
Decision Date
Jul 13, 2009
Petitioner, a former employee, was charged with Qualified Theft for depositing a dishonored BDO check. SC ruled it an Impossible Crime, not Theft, due to the check's worthlessness, sentencing her to six months arresto mayor.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 162540)

Petitioner

Gemma T. Jacinto served as Mega Foam’s collector until June 30, 1997. She was charged with qualified theft for allegedly misappropriating a P10,000 postdated Banco de Oro check given by Baby Aquino as payment to Mega Foam.

Respondent

The People of the Philippines prosecuted before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Caloocan City, Branch 131, with the Court of Appeals (CA) affirming the conviction, and the Supreme Court (SC) subsequently reviewing the CA decision.

Key Dates

• June–July 1997: Baby Aquino issues P10,000 check to petitioner.
• Mid-July 1997: Check dishonored; plan devised to replace it with cash.
• August 15 & 21, 1997: Entrapment operations conducted by NBI.
• October 4, 1999: RTC renders decision convicting all three accused.
• December 16, 2003: CA affirms/modifies RTC decision.
• March 5, 2004: CA denies petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.
• July 13, 2009: SC promulgates final decision.

Applicable Law

1987 Philippine Constitution; Revised Penal Code, Articles 308 (theft), 309 (penalty based on value), 310 (qualified theft), Article 4(2) (impossible crime), and Article 59 (penalty for impossible crime).

Facts

Baby Aquino delivered a P10,000 postdated check to Jacinto for Mega Foam purchases. Instead of remitting it, petitioner allegedly conspired with Valencia and Capitle to deposit the check into Generoso Capitle’s Land Bank account. Upon dishonor, they planned to obtain cash replacement and split proceeds. An NBI-supervised entrapment resulted in petitioner receiving marked bills, leading to her arrest.

RTC Findings

The RTC found that petitioner, Valencia, and Capitle unlawfully took the check with intent to gain, abusing the trust reposed in them as employees. All were convicted of qualified theft and sentenced to five years, five months, eleven days to six years, eight months, twenty days of imprisonment.

CA Ruling

The CA modified the RTC decision: it maintained Jacinto’s sentence, reduced Valencia’s punishment to four months of arresto mayor medium, and acquitted Jacqueline Capitle.

Issues on Review

  1. Whether petitioner was convicted of an uncharged crime.
  2. Whether a dishonored check may constitute the object of theft.
  3. Whether the evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

SC Analysis

Qualified theft requires the thing taken to have value (RPC Arts. 308, 309, 310). The P10,000 check was dishonored and therefore lacked value. Under Article 4(2) and Article 59 (impossible crime), an act intended to commit theft but inherently impossible or rendered so by extraneous circumstances constitutes an “impossible crime.” The SC likened this to factual impossibility (e.g., reaching

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.