Title
J. Casim Construction Supplies, Inc. vs. Registrar of Deeds of Las Pinas
Case
G.R. No. 168655
Decision Date
Jul 2, 2010
JCCSI filed a petition to cancel a disputed lis pendens on its property title, alleging forgery. Las Piñas RTC dismissed it, ruling jurisdiction lies with Makati RTC, where the main case was filed. Supreme Court affirmed, stating lis pendens served its purpose.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 168655)

Legal Background

This case revolves around the cancellation of a notice of lis pendens Annotated on TCT No. 49936, under civil case LP-04-0071, filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Las Piñas City, Branch 253. The petitioner’s original action was dismissed by the RTC due to lack of jurisdiction, as the matter of cancelling a notice of lis pendens typically lies with the court where the main action regarding the property is pending.

Factual Background

The petitioner acquired a 10,715-square meter property through a Deed of Absolute Sale in 1982, resulting in the issuance of TCT No. 49936. In March 2004, the petitioner sought to cancel a notice of lis pendens that had been filed in relation to a prior civil case involving Bruneo F. Casim. The petitioner asserted that the notice was invalid due to alleged forgery and cited the absence of associated transaction records.

Intervenor's Position

The Intestate Estate of Bruneo F. Casim contested the jurisdiction of the RTC of Las Piñas to entertain the cancellation petition, claiming that the cancellation should occur before the court overseeing the primary case linked to the notice. It emphasized that the original case had reached finality, rendering the petition legally baseless.

Trial Court Decision

On April 14, 2005, the RTC dismissed the petition, determining it lacked jurisdiction, as the cancellation of the lis pendens should be resolved in the court handling the main underlying case. Furthermore, the RTC asserted that allegations of forgery must be substantiated with positive proof, which the petitioner failed to provide.

Jurisdictional Argument

In the current petition, the petitioner argues that the RTC has inherent power to cancel a notice of lis pendens, especially as the petitioner was not a party in the original civil case. The petitioner challenges the trial court's dismissal and contends that the notice was improperly annotated.

Legal Principles on Lis Pendens

The concept of lis pendens refers to the legal principle that a court gains jurisdiction over the property involved in an ongoing litigation, which impacts any transactions regarding that property. A party can seek cancellation of a notice of lis pendens through the court handling the main action based on applicable legal grounds.

Findings on Inherent Power of RTC

The Court affirmed that the RTC of Las Piñas lacked jurisdiction in this matter, as it was merely incidental to the prior action. Correspondingly, the petitioner would need to pursue this cancellation before the RTC of Makati City, which had control over the property in question during the earlier case.

Finality of Previous Judgment

Given the finality of the preceding case, the notice of lis pendens had effectively served its purpose. The Court confirmed that the petitioner’s title to the land could only be challenged through administrative remedies accordi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.