Title
Island Sales, Inc. vs. Daco
Case
G.R. No. L-22493
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1975
A partnership's default on a vehicle installment led to a lawsuit; partners' liability was ruled pro rata, unaffected by one partner's dismissal.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-22493)

Factual Background

On April 22, 1961, United Pioneers General Construction Company, a general partnership, purchased a motor vehicle from Island Sales, Inc. on the installment plan. The partnership executed a promissory note for P9,440.00, payable in twelve monthly installments of P786.63, the first payable on or before May 22, 1961 and subsequent installments on the 22nd of each month. The note provided that failure to pay any installment when due would render the whole unpaid balance immediately due and demandable. The installment due on July 22, 1961 was not paid. The plaintiff sued for the unpaid balance totaling P7,119.07.

Trial Court Proceedings

The plaintiff named the partnership and its general partners, including Benjamin C. Daco, as defendants. Daniel A. Guizona failed to answer and was declared in default. Upon motion of the plaintiff, the complaint was dismissed as to Romulo B. Lumauig. When the case was called for hearing, the defendants and their counsel did not appear despite notice. The trial court permitted the plaintiff to present its evidence ex parte. The trial court rendered judgment against the partnership for P7,119.07 with interest at 12% per annum, attorney's fees of P800.00, and costs. The court adjudged that the individual partners would be subsidiarily liable only if the partnership had no more leviable property, and that the individual defendants would also pay costs.

Motion for Reconsideration and Parties' Contentions

Defendants Benjamin C. Daco and Noel C. Sim moved for reconsideration. They contended that, as there were five general partners when the promissory note was executed, the joint and subsidiary liability of each partner should not exceed one-fifth of the partnership obligation. The plaintiff assented to limiting the liability of Daco and Sim to one-fifth of the partnership's obligation. The trial court denied the motion for reconsideration.

Issue Presented

The sole legal question presented was whether dismissal of the complaint in favor of one of the general partners increases the joint and subsidiary liability of each of the remaining partners for the obligations of the partnership.

Applicable Law

The Court examined Art. 1816 of the Civil Code, which provides: "All partners including industrial ones, shall be liable pro rata with all their property and after all the partnership assets have been exhausted, for the contracts which may be entered into in the name and for the account of the partnership, under its signature and by a person authorized to act for the partnership. However, any partner may enter into a separate obligation to perform a partnership contract." The Court also cited Co-Pitco vs. Yulo (8 Phil. 544) for the proposition that, in a civil partnership, partners are not each liable for the whole debt and that liability is pro rata.

Court's Analysis

The Court noted that five general partners existed when the promissory note was executed on behalf of the partnership. Applying Art. 1816, the Court reasoned that the partners' liability is pro rata and that individual liability of a partner cannot be i

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.