Title
Isabela-I Electric Coop., Inc. vs. Del Rosario, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 226369
Decision Date
Jul 17, 2019
Employee demoted despite qualifications; Supreme Court ruled constructive dismissal, ordered reinstatement with damages for bad faith and salary diminution.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 234812)

Undisputed Facts

Respondent was initially hired on January 29, 1996, as a Financial Assistant and quickly advanced to the roles of Acting Management Internal Auditor and then Management Internal Auditor, earning a salary of P30,979.00 per month. In January 2011, a company-wide reorganization was approved, leading to all positions being declared vacant. Despite employees’ opposition, including a manifesto from Del Rosario, the reorganization proceeded in June 2011. By October 2012, while on vacation leave, Del Rosario received letters from the petitioner appointing him as a probationary Area Operations Manager, alongside instructions that diminished his previous responsibilities. Although Del Rosario expressed concerns regarding this new position, he accepted it under protest.

Complaint Filed

On January 30, 2013, Del Rosario filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against the petitioner, claiming unlawful demotion and constructive dismissal. He outlined that his former position as Management Internal Auditor had a higher Salary Rank (20 with a salary of Php33,038.05) compared to his new position (Salary Rank 19, Php30,963.95), which also involved fewer responsibilities. Del Rosario contended that the reorganization violated the petitioner’s own guidelines and that he was unjustly denied his original position which was not abolished.

Petitioner’s Explanation

The petitioner defended its actions by citing the need for reorganization in accordance with Republic Act No. 9136 (RA 9136) and guidelines provided by the National Electrification Administration (NEA). They argued that the reorganization was conducted smoothly, resulted in enhanced productivity, and that Del Rosario’s new appointment had not resulted in a decrease in compensation.

Labor Arbiter’s Ruling

On August 29, 2013, the Labor Arbiter dismissed the complaint, asserting that the reorganization was valid and aimed at compliance with NEA policy without evidence of bad faith on the part of the petitioner.

NLRC Ruling

Upon appeal, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed the Labor Arbiter’s ruling on November 20, 2013, finding that Del Rosario was constructively dismissed as he was appointed to a position that carried a lower salary grade and did not have justifiable cause for not being reinstated to his previous position.

Court of Appeals' Ruling

The Court of Appeals upheld the NLRC’s decision on December 21, 2015, but modified the ruling by deleting the award for salary differential. The petitioner’s motion for reconsideration was subsequently denied on July 7, 2016.

The Present Petition

The petitioner sought to appeal the Court of Appeals’ decisions, reiterating their earlier arguments regarding the legality of the reorganization and the subsequent appointment of Del Rosario.

Issue

The central issue is whether Del Rosario was constructively dismissed when appointed to the new position of Area Operations Management Department Manager, thereby experiencing a demotion in rank, responsibilities, or salary.

Ruling

The Court reaffirmed the principles surrounding management prerogative but highlighted that such power is constrained by the need to ensure justice and fair play. It ruled that Del Rosario indeed faced demotion as his new position involved lesser responsibilities compared to his prior role as Man

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.