Title
International Catholic Migration Commission vs. Calleja
Case
G.R. No. 85750
Decision Date
Sep 28, 1990
The Supreme Court upheld the diplomatic immunity of ICMC and IRRI, exempting them from Philippine labor laws, including certification elections, to ensure unimpeded operations under international law.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 85750)

Certification Election Petition and Initial Rulings in ICMC Case

On 14 July 1986, TUPAS sought a certification election among ICMC’s rank-and-file employees. The Med-Arbiter dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction, citing ICMC’s claimed diplomatic immunity. On appeal, BLR Director Calleja reversed and ordered an election.

Grant of Specialized Agency Status and Claim of Immunity by ICMC

DEFORAF granted ICMC specialized agency status on 15 July 1988 under a Memorandum of Agreement, conferring diplomatic privileges and immunities. ICMC’s motions to dismiss the election petition were denied by BLR. ICMC filed certiorari and secured a temporary restraining order.

Executive Branch Determinations and Writ of Certiorari

DEFORAF intervened, asserting its authority over diplomatic immunities. By July 1989, the Supreme Court required memoranda on whether ICMC’s immunity exempts it from Philippine labor laws.

Background of the IRRI Research Institute

Established by a 1959 MOU and registered as a private corporation, IRRI was conferred international organization status with full immunities by PD 1620 (1979). Its mandate is basic and applied research on rice for global food security.

Certification Election Petition and Initial Rulings in IRRI Case

On 20 April 1987, Kapisanan filed for a direct certification election at IRRI. Med-Arbiter Garcia dismissed it under PD 1620. The BLR Director reversed, ordering an election based on Labor Code Art. 243 and Constitution Art. XIII §3. The Secretary of Labor later dismissed the petition, upholding IRRI’s immunity, prompting certiorari by Kapisanan.

Constitutional and International Law Framework for Diplomatic Immunity

Under the 1987 Constitution (Art II §2), international law is part of domestic law. The 1947 Convention on Privileges and Immunities of Specialized Agencies (ratified 1950), ICMC’s MOA, and PD 1620 explicitly grant immunity from all legal processes except by express waiver.

Scope and Justification of International Organization Immunities

Specialized agencies enjoy immunity to ensure functional independence, protect common international funds, and prevent host-state interference. Jurisdiction by Philippine authorities would undermine impartial fulfillment of each agency’s international mandate.

Employee Remedies and Limits on Immunity

International immunities do not deny employees all recourse. The 1947 Convention requires agencies to establish modes of settlement for private disputes. ICMC’s MOA permits withdrawal of immunity upon abuse. IRRI has an internal Council on Employees and Manage

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.