Title
Insular Life Assurance Company, Ltd. vs. Young
Case
G.R. No. 140964
Decision Date
Jan 16, 2002
Robert Young acquired a bank, faced financial issues due to a failed sale, signed agreements with Insular Life, admitted irregularities, lost pledged shares, and legal proceedings ensued.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 140964)

Undisputed Facts

Respondents acquired Home Bankers for P65 million in 1987. The Bank granted P153 million in loans secured by promissory notes. Young attempted to sell consolidated shares to Benito Araneta; Araneta defaulted and demanded return of downpayment, plunging Young into financial distress. Young then borrowed P200 million from Insular Life, pledging his and co-stockholders’ shares, and executed a promissory note at 26% interest due in 120 days.

Nature of the MOA

On October 9, 1991, a MOA bound Insular Life (and its Pension Fund) to purchase 830,860 and 311,572 shares respectively, for P198 million, “subject to”:

  1. Young’s infusion of an additional P50 million capital into the Bank;
  2. Due diligence audit confirming only P60 million in doubtful loans;
  3. Young’s warranties as to paid-in capital, net worth, and doubtful loans;
  4. Execution of a formal Deed of Sale.

Conditions Precedent and Non-fulfillment

Audit revealed P340 million in check-kiting irregularities; Young failed to infuse the required P50 million; his warranties proved false. Under Civil Code Art. 1181, no obligation arises until suspensive conditions are satisfied. Because conditions precedent were unmet and no Deed of Sale was executed, the MOA remained a contract to sell, not a perfected sale.

Pledge Foreclosure and Auction Sale

Young acknowledged default by letter dated October 21, 1991, waiving the credit period. Insular Life notified him of public auctions on October 28 and 29 pursuant to Civil Code Art. 2112. Only Insular Life bid; shares were appropriated in satisfaction of the loan, and title consolidated in Insular Life’s name. BSP approved maintenance of the 99.82% shareholding.

Court of Appeals’ Rulings

The CA held the MOA valid despite non-compliance, applied Art. 1599 to deem Young’s debt fully paid by the P198 million sale proceeds, ordered Insular Life to pay Young P162 million (45% equity’s value), P5 million moral damages, and P1.5 million attorney’s fees, and declared other respondents’ loans fully paid. It later granted execution pending appeal.

Supreme Court’s Analysis

  1. MOA was conditional; failure of conditions negated any sale.
  2. No Deed of Sale or satisfaction of suspensive conditions prevented transfer of ownership.
  3. Insular Life validly foreclosed the pledge; single notice covering both auctions satisfied Art. 2112’s purpose.
  4. CA decision lacked clear statement of factual and legal bases in violation of Constitution Art. VII(14).
  5. Award of moral damages and attorney’s fees was unjustified: no fraud o

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.