Title
IN RE: Yu vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-17748
Decision Date
Nov 28, 1962
Manuel Yu, a Chinese national residing in the Philippines, sought naturalization but was denied due to insufficient proof of genuine employment and a non-lucrative income, despite his integration into Filipino society and clean record.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-17748)

Grounds for Petition

Manuel Yu's petition for naturalization was primarily denied on the basis that he was not engaged in a lucrative lawful occupation. Despite being of legal age and having continuously resided in the Philippines, the court found his earnings insufficient to qualify for naturalization under the prevailing laws.

Evidence of Residency and Character

The evidence presented by Yu supports his claim of continuous residence in the Philippines since childhood, highlighting his integration into Filipino society. He has demonstrated a belief in the principles of the Philippine Constitution, good moral character, and no affiliations that oppose or undermine organized government. Furthermore, he has not been charged with any crimes, nor does he suffer from any mental or contagious diseases.

Employment Status and Earnings

Yu claimed to earn an annual income of ₱1,440 as a sales representative for the Victory Steel Chair Factory owned by his mother. However, the court required more substantial proof of his employment status due to the potential conflict of interest arising from being employed by a family member. The court did not find the salary sufficient to qualify as lucrative, especially in light of the high cost of living and the low purchasing power of the currency at that time.

Additional Claims and Court’s Rationale

Yu attempted to contend that the free board and lodging provided by his mother should be considered part of his income, but the court noted that even when factoring this in, his total monthly income would not meet the threshold required for naturalization. Prior case law supported the notion that a minimum monthly income of ₱250 was necessary, with even lower amounts deemed insufficient for this purpose.

Conclusion and Affirmation of Ruling

The Court upheld the earlier decision of the Court

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.