Title
IN RE: Yu vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-20752
Decision Date
Nov 25, 1967
Petitioner sought to correct his name from "Sincio Yee" to "Sencio Yu," citing a midwife's error. SC ruled it a clerical error under Art. 412, allowing the correction.

Case Summary (A.M. No. 07-8-3-SC)

Background of the Case

The petitioner was born on May 16, 1967, to Chinese citizens Yu Cho Koo and Tiu Oh Yek and was registered in the Bureau of Immigration under the name Sincio C. Yu. However, a clerical error in the Local Civil Registry recorded his name as Sincio C. Yee. The error originated from the report made by the Chinese midwife present during his birth, who mistakenly spelled his first name and surname. To address this issue, the petitioner filed a verified petition to have his name corrected to SencĂ­o Yu.

Opposition to the Petition

The Republic of the Philippines opposed the petition, arguing that the requested changes were substantial rather than mere clerical or harmless errors as defined under Article 412 of the Civil Code. The opposition raised concerns over whether changing "Sincio" to "Sencio" constituted a significant alteration or if it could be classified as a clerical error deserving rectification.

Court Hearing and Findings

During the hearing, the Solicitor representing the Republic withdrew their objection to changing the surname from "Yee" to "Yu," acknowledging that the original record unambiguously indicated that the correct surname should be "Yu." The primary contention remained the change of the first name.

Legal Interpretation of Clerical Errors

The crux of the case centers on whether altering "Sincio" to "Sencio" could be viewed as a clerical error. The court opined that this change merely involved adjusting a vowel, which is consistent with defining a clerical error as one made in copying or writing. Established jurisprudence supports that misspelled words and harmless changes, such as those involving clearly misspelled names, should be correctable through judicial means.

Court Decision

The court concluded that the change from "Sincio" to "Sencio" did not represent a substantial modification but rather a correction of a clerical error as defined under Article 412

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.