Title
IN RE: Uytengsu vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-6379
Decision Date
Sep 29, 1954
Wilfred Uytengsu's naturalization petition was denied due to his failure to maintain continuous physical residence in the Philippines after filing, as required by law.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 144486)

Background Facts

Wilfred Uytengsu received his primary education in Saint Theresa’s College and completed his secondary education at San Carlos College and Siliman University. He pursued higher studies in the United States, attending Leland Stanford Junior University and completing a postgraduate course in chemical engineering. His application for citizenship was filed while he was still in the United States, leading to questions regarding his residency status in the Philippines at the time of both the filing and the scheduled hearing for his application.

Legal Argument

The core of the appeal revolves around whether Uytengsu's absence from the Philippines after filing his application affects his eligibility for naturalization. The Solicitor General contended that the law requires the applicant to maintain actual residence in the Philippines from the filing of the application until the decision is rendered. Section 7 of Commonwealth Act No. 473 mandates that a petitioner must declare their intention to reside continuously in the Philippines during this period.

Definition of Residence vs. Domicile

The discussion highlights the legal distinction between "residence" and "domicile." While both terms are often used interchangeably, in legal terms, "residence" refers to physical presence, while "domicile" implies the intention to remain permanently. The court emphasized that Uytengsu's intent to return to the Philippines was not clear, as evidenced by his departure for studies shortly after filing his application.

Court’s Interpretation

The court stated that the promise made by Uytengsu in his application to reside continuously in the Philippines must not be viewed as mere formalism. The law was constructed to ensure that the government has the opportunity to observe and assess the applicant’s character and qualifications. Uytengsu's absence significantly undermined any such assessment, as he continued to reside in the United States for almost five years after his application.

Conclusion and Dec

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.