Title
IN RE: Uy vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-20194
Decision Date
Jul 17, 1969
James Uy, a Chinese citizen born in Manila, sought naturalization but was denied due to insufficient income, unauthorized alias use, and lack of evidence of irreproachable conduct.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-20194)

Background of the Case

Uy filed his petition for naturalization on May 29, 1961. He claimed to have been born on September 20, 1939, in the City of Manila, and alleged continuous residence in the Philippines for at least fifteen years prior to his application. He asserted that he was single, had received his education from De La Salle College, and possessed sufficient financial resources, claiming an annual income from dividends and a salary as an employee. His net worth included capital stock inherited from his deceased father and cash savings.

Denial of Naturalization Application

The lower court denied Uy’s application for several reasons. The primary grounds included the court's finding that he did not engage in a lucrative profession or occupation, a lack of evidence demonstrating irreproachable conduct throughout his residence in the Philippines, and the use of an alias without proper authority. The court scrutinized his employment claims, noting that his salary was only P180.00 and that his supposed employer, Uy Su Bin and Co., was controlled by his family members, suggesting a fabricated employment status aimed at meeting the naturalization requirements.

Assessment of Employment Claims

Despite Uy's assertion that he was employed for a month before filing his application, the court concluded that this employment was merely a strategic maneuver meant to circumvent the requirements of the Revised Naturalization Law. The court emphasized that the income he reported did not meet the threshold of what would be considered a lucrative occupation, referencing previous case law wherein an annual income of P8,687.50 was deemed insufficient for naturalization.

Conclusion on Alias Usage

Regarding the usage of an alias, the trial court found that Uy was indeed known by both his given name and the alias, Uy Khe Khun. The evidence presented in court showed that his name was recorded as such in official documents, reinforcing the court's conclusion that he had been using this alias without the requisite legal authority. Uy's attempt to attribute the use of the al

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.