Title
IN RE: Tan Tek Chian vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-21035
Decision Date
Jan 22, 1981
Petitioner's naturalization voided due to failure to publish notice in three consecutive Official Gazette issues, a jurisdictional defect under Ong Son Cui doctrine.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-21035)

Petitioner and Respondent

  • Petitioner-Appellant: Tan Tek Chian (aka Jose Tan)
  • Oppositor-Appellee: Republic of the Philippines

Applicable Law

The legal framework guiding this case primarily involves the provisions related to naturalization in Philippine law as it pertains to the constitution and precedents established by the Supreme Court, notably the Ong Son Cui and Gan Tsitung cases, which outline the jurisdictional requirements and procedural validity for naturalization applications.

Jurisdictional Issues in Naturalization

The core issue in this case revolves around the necessity of complying with the statutory requirement of publishing a notice of the naturalization application in the Official Gazette for three consecutive issues. The Supreme Court has previously determined that failure to meet this publication requirement constitutes a jurisdictional defect that renders any naturalization decision invalid. This principle was firmly established in cases leading up to this decision, specifically in Gan Tsitung v. Republic.

Importance of the Date of Naturalization

The ruling emphasizes that the critical date for determining the validity of a naturalization certificate is the date on which the certificate is issued, rather than the date of the application or the rendering of the decision itself. In this instance, Tan Tek Chian took his oath of office for naturalization on July 20, 1957, which falls after the pivotal Ong Son Cui ruling promulgated on May 29, 1957. As established, no rights are vested until the actual issuance of the certificate of naturalization occurs.

Affirmation of Lower Court Decision

The lower court's order, which declared null and void the decision granting Tan Tek Chian’s naturalization and canceled his certificate of citizenship, was affirmed by the Supreme Court. The ruling reinforces that adherence to established jurisprudence on the naturalization process is paramount, and any deviation, as would occur if the naturalization were allowed based on an inva

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.