Title
IN RE: Rovero
Case
A.C. No. 126
Decision Date
Dec 29, 1980
A disbarred lawyer, Tranquilino Rovero, sought reinstatement after 28 years, demonstrating moral rehabilitation, civic contributions, and an absolute pardon, leading to his reinstatement by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (Adm. Case No. 997)

Procedural and Factual Background: Conviction and Disbarment

Attorney Rovero was convicted by a competent court for violation of Section 2703 of the Revised Administrative Code (smuggling) and was sentenced to pay a fine of P2,500.00. On October 24, 1952, the Court ordered his disbarment and the surrender of his lawyer’s certificate.

Post-Conviction Petitions for Reinstatement and Prior Denials

Rovero filed a petition for reinstatement on July 7, 1956, asserting hardship caused by disbarment and that he had been granted an absolute and unconditional pardon and restored to full civil and political rights; the petition included a pledge of future good conduct. The Court denied that petition. He again sought readmission on March 10, 1958, which the Court likewise denied. He later renewed his petition when he was about 71 years old.

Legal Standard for Readmission to the Bar

The Court reiterated the established rule that an applicant for reinstatement must satisfy the Court, as a candidate for admission would, that he is a person of good moral character and otherwise a fit and proper person to practice law. The decision cites Cui v. Cui for this standard.

Evidence of Rehabilitation and Good Conduct

The Court reviewed substantial evidence of Rovero’s post-disbarment conduct: active participation in civic and educational organizations; service as secretary of the Provincial Board of Aklan; accreditation as a delegate of the Aklan Chapter of the Philippine National Red Cross to its Second Biennial National Convention; role in organizing and serving as president of the Quezon City Central Lions Club; presidency of the Board of Trustees of the Northwestern Visayan Colleges in Kalibo, Aklan; and executive positions in commercial establishments (president of Filipino Industrial Corporation, vice-president of Meteor Company, Inc., and president of the Rural Bank of Hermosa in Bataan). Testimonials from community and professional leaders—including certification of good conduct by the president of the Aklan Bar Association and commendation from his parish priest—were presented and considered by the Court.

Effect of the Absolute and Unconditional Pardon

The Court examined the legal effect of the absolute and unconditional pardon granted by President Ramon Magsaysay. Applying the principle reiterated in In re Marcelino Lontok, the Court treated a full (plenary) pardon as one that releases punishment, blots out the guilt in the eyes of the law, removes disabilities resulting from conviction, and in effect restores the individual’s civil capacities. On this basis, the pardon was held to have significant rehabilitative legal effect relevant to Rovero’s fitness to practice law.

Passage of Time and Sufficiency of Punishment

The Court noted the lengthy interval—more than 28 years—since Rovero’s disbarment and found that he had been sufficiently punished and disciplined. This consideration of time elapsed since disciplinary action, together with demonstrated rehab

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.