Case Summary (A.M. OCA IPI No. 10-21-SB-J)
Investigation Initiated
The complaint was referred to the Supreme Court by the Office of the Ombudsman, prompting the Court to direct the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) to conduct a discreet investigation. The OCA assembled a team to investigate the matter over a period spanning March 8 to March 31, 2010.
OCA Report Findings
The OCA's report indicated ownership of several properties by Justice Jurado and Atty. Buencamino across Metro Manila. It was reported that Justice Jurado had understated his properties in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) for multiple years, and that inconsistencies were noted in Atty. Buencamino's SALN.
Detailed Property Analysis
The investigation revealed extensive real estate holdings by both Justice Jurado and Atty. Buencamino. Various Transfer Certificates of Title and Tax Declarations were scrutinized, and discrepancies were noted, particularly in the number of properties listed in their SALNs compared to actual property ownership.
Justice Jurado's Position
In his defense, Justice Jurado maintained that he had collectively declared his properties, clarifying that several properties referenced in the OCA's findings were actually derived from single titles or sold prior to the valuation dates indicated in the SALNs. He further argued that the alleged purchased properties were solely declared based on legitimate financial activities.
Atty. Buencamino's Explanation
Atty. Buencamino denied allegations of immorality or unexplained wealth, attributing her real estate investments to inheritance and legitimate business ventures. She countered that claims of previous investigations against her were retaliatory actions stemming from past grievances within the judiciary.
Legal Standards and Reporting Requirements
The Court reaffirmed that substantial evidence regarding the SALN is required to establish any finding of guilt against government officials. The filing of SALNs is mandated by Republic Act No. 6713, and while prior rules allowed a more general statement of capital, enhance
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. OCA IPI No. 10-21-SB-J)
Background of the Case
- The case arose from an anonymous letter-complaint filed against Justice Roland B. Jurado and Clerk of Court IV Mona Lisa A. Buencamino, alleging unexplained wealth and immorality.
- The complaint was initially submitted to the Office of the President and subsequently forwarded to the Office of the Ombudsman.
- The Ombudsman referred the matter to the Supreme Court, which required the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) to conduct a discreet investigation.
Investigation Process
- The OCA appointed a team of lawyers and a court chauffeur to investigate from March 8 to 31, 2010.
- The investigation revealed that both Jurado and Buencamino owned multiple properties in Metro Manila.
- Justice Jurado was found to have understated his assets in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) for several years, while Buencamino's SALN contained numerous inconsistencies.
Findings on Property Ownership
- The OCA compiled a detailed report on the properties owned by both respondents:
- Justice Jurado's Properties:
- Multiple titles in Las Piñas, Mandaluyong, Cainta, and Pasig City.
- Notably, TCT No. T-23272 was co-owned with Buencamino, raising questions due to Jurado's marital status.
- Buencamino's Properties:
- Various properties in Las Piñas acquired through inheritance and other means.
- Discrepancies in her 1992
- Justice Jurado's Properties: