Title
IN RE: Petition for the Allowance of Will Proved Outside of the Philippines
Case
G.R. No. 269883
Decision Date
May 13, 2024
Allison Lynn Akana challenged the RTC's dismissal of her petition for reprobate of a will executed abroad, claiming jurisdiction errors. The Supreme Court ruled in her favor, asserting RTC's jurisdiction over reprobate petitions and set aside prior dismissals.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 269883)

Background of the Case

Lynetta died on February 13, 2017, and left a will naming Allison as her personal representative. The will was informally admitted to probate in Hawaii on September 17, 2019, leading to the issuance of Letters Testamentary in Allison’s favor. In 2022, Allison sought to allow the will probated in Hawaii to be recognized in the Philippines and filed a petition under Rule 77 of the Rules of Court before the Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC) in Cebu City. This petition was dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction, prompting Allison to subsequently file a similar petition with the RTC.

RTC's Jurisdictional Ruling

On July 12, 2023, the RTC dismissed Allison’s petition, determining that the court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter based on the value of the estate, which was below PHP 2,000,000.00. The RTC cited that amendments to Batas Pambansa (B.P.) Blg. 129 by Republic Act No. 11576 reorganized the jurisdictional framework for probate proceedings, stating that municipal trial courts now have exclusive original jurisdiction for estates valued at or below PHP 2,000,000.00.

Allison's Argument in Petition

Allison argued in her Petition that the RTC erred in its ruling, contending that Rule 77 specifically grants jurisdiction over reprobate proceedings to the RTC irrespective of the estate’s value. She also asserted that the processes of probate and reprobate are distinct and should not be conflated as the RTC had done. Furthermore, Allison mentioned that actions for reprobate are incapable of pecuniary estimation, reinforcing the argument for RTC jurisdiction.

Legal Issues Presented

The central issue arises from whether the RTC was correct in concluding it lacked jurisdiction to entertain Allison’s petition for reprobate proceedings. This legal question primarily revolves around the interpretation of jurisdictional statutes and the application of Rule 77 in the context of foreign wills probated abroad.

The Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in Allison’s Petition, acknowledging that the issue raised was solely a question of law. The Court ruled that the RTC had erred in classifying the reprobate of a foreign will as a matter within the traditional confines of probate proceedings, which are contingent on the estate's value. The Court clarified that reprobate is intended to affirm the validity of a foreign will already probated abroad, and the RTC retains jurisdiction over such matters regardless of the estate's value in the Philippines.

Distinction between Probate and Reprobate

The Supreme Court emphasized that probate and reprobate are fundamentally different legal processes. The former requires the de

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.