Title
IN RE: Padilla vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-28274
Decision Date
Apr 30, 1982
A mother sought to change her legitimate children’s surname to her second husband’s, but the Supreme Court ruled it violated the Civil Code, risking paternity confusion and deeming the petition premature.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-28274)

Relevant Background

On May 5, 1954, Dolores Gemora married Vincent Co, with whom she had five legitimate children. Following Co's abandonment of the family in November 1960 and subsequent legal recognition as an absentee by the Court of First Instance of Pampanga, Dolores remarried Edward Padilla on October 30, 1965. The children, living with Dolores and Padilla, received support and affection from their stepfather, which prompted Dolores to petition for a change of the children’s surname from "Copuaco" or "Co" to "Padilla".

Legal Framework

This case hinges on the interpretation of Article 364 of the Civil Code, which mandates that legitimate children use their father's surname. The Solicitor General argues that allowing the children to adopt the surname of their mother’s second husband contravenes this statutory provision, potentially leading to confusion regarding paternity and questions about the children's legitimacy.

Judicial Reasoning

The court acknowledged the merits of the Solicitor General's appeal, citing prior jurisprudence in Moore vs. Republic. The court emphasized that allowing the children to adopt the surname of Edward Padilla, who is not their biological father, could create legal ambiguities concerning their true paternity. It was reasoned that, while Dolores Gemora’s intentions may stem from a desire to foster familial unity, the legal framework precludes such a change based on existing laws regarding surnames of legitimate children.

Prematurity of Petition

Furthermore, the court highlighted that the petition for a change of surname is premature, advocating that decisions regarding surname changes should be left to the children themselves once they reach the age of maturity. The court opined that at that stage, the children could take appropriate lega

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.