Title
IN RE: Manzano
Case
A.M. No. 88-7-1861-RTC
Decision Date
Oct 5, 1988
Judge Manzano's request to join a provincial justice committee was denied, as it violated constitutional prohibitions on judges performing administrative functions, preserving judicial independence.

Case Summary (A.M. No. 88-7-1861-RTC)

Key Dates

  • December 12, 1986: Presidential Executive Order No. 856 creates Provincial/City Committees on Justice
  • June 1, 1988: Executive Order No. 326 amends EO 856
  • June 21, 1988: Governor Farinas issues EO RF6-04 designating Judge Manzano as member of the Ilocos Norte Provincial Committee on Justice
  • July 4, 1988: Judge Manzano formally requests Supreme Court authorization to accept the Committee appointment
  • October 5, 1988: Supreme Court renders its decision

Applicable Law

  • 1987 Constitution, Article VIII, Section 12: “The members of the Supreme Court and other courts established by law shall not be designated to any agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative functions.”
  • Executive Orders Nos. 856 (creating the Committees) and 326 (amending supervisory provisions)

Factual Background

Judge Manzano was formally appointed by EO RF6-04 to serve on the Ilocos Norte Provincial Committee on Justice, a body tasked with facilitating speedy disposition of cases involving indigent detainees, recommending revisions to prejudicial laws, and investigating complaints against judicial and law enforcement officers. Before assuming his functions, he sought a Supreme Court resolution (1) authorizing his acceptance, (2) declaring that such membership would not violate judicial independence or constitutional prohibitions, and (3) treating the membership as part of his executive-judge duties.

Constitutional and Legal Issue

Does a trial-court judge violate Article VIII, Section 12 of the 1987 Constitution by serving as a member of a Provincial Committee on Justice that performs administrative functions under the supervision of the Secretary of Justice?

Majority Analysis

  1. Nature of Committee Functions
    • The Provincial Committee on Justice exercises administrative functions: it receives complaints against officials, recommends legal reforms, and reports to the Secretary of Justice. Administrative functions involve regulation, control, and promulgation of rules to carry out legislative policy.
  2. Constitutional Prohibition
    • Article VIII, Section 12 prohibits members of the judiciary from designation to any agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative duties.
  3. Effect of Membership
    • By joining a body that performs administrative functions, a judge would encroach upon executive powers and compromise judicial independence.
  4. Precedent and Principle
    • Reliance on past rulings emphasizes the strict separation of judicial duties from non-judicial functions to preserve impartiality and public respect for the judiciary.

Decision

The Supreme Court, en banc, denied Judge Manzano’s request. It held that membership in the Provincial Committee on Justice constitutes administrative service proscribed by the Constitution and would violate the principle of separation of powers.

Dissenting Opinions

  1. Justice Gutierrez, Jr. (joined by Justices Melencio-Herrera, Fernan, Narvasa, Grino-Aquino)

    • Argues that the Committee’s work is purely advisory, not regulatory or quasi-legislative, and does not exercise control over individuals.
    • Maintains that judges should participate in study groups addressing justice administration, so lon
...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.