Title
IN RE: Koa Heng vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-21079
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1966
Koa Heng, a Chinese national, petitioned for Philippine naturalization but was denied due to omitted residences, insufficient income, reproachable conduct, and use of aliases.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 232199)

Decision Background

The case reached the Court of First Instance of Pampanga, which, on July 19, 1962, granted Koa Heng's petition for naturalization. The Republic of the Philippines subsequently appealed the decision, arguing several points against the granting of citizenship.

Legal Framework

The applicable law in determining naturalization is the Revised Naturalization Law. The key provisions relate to the requirements for citizenship, including good moral character, the ability to support oneself and family, and truthful disclosure of personal history in the application.

Arguments Presented by the Respondent

The Republic raised multiple objections, specifically asserting that Koa Heng:

  1. Failed to disclose all former places of residence since his arrival in the Philippines.
  2. Lacked a lucrative trade or profession sufficient to support his family.
  3. Exhibited reproachable conduct by using multiple aliases and not registering two of his children with the Bureau of Immigration.
  4. Presented character witnesses of questionable credibility.

Omissions in the Petition

Koa Heng's omission of residential history from 1934 to 1943 was highlighted as a serious flaw, contradicting Section 7 of the Revised Naturalization Law that mandates full disclosure of past addresses. Such omissions hindered verification of the petitioner’s qualifications and character, rendering the application defective regardless of the intention behind the omission.

Financial Capacity Assessment

The requirement concerning the financial capacity of the petitioner was assessed based on his declared income, which was P6,000 annually at the time of his application. Given his family size—comprising a wife and seven children—this income was deemed insufficient to classify him as having a lucrative trade or profession under the law.

Reproachable Conduct and Registration Issues

The petitioner admitted that at least one of his children was not registered with the Bureau of Immigration. While Koa Heng referenced a prior case suggesting that such registration failures should not prevent naturalization, the court

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.