Title
IN RE: King vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-19082
Decision Date
Sep 29, 1966
Casiano King, a Chinese national in Manila, sought Philippine naturalization. His petition was denied due to insufficient evidence of irreproachable conduct and inadequate income, as bonuses/commissions were excluded from lucrative income assessment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 181721)

Petitioner Background

The petitioner, Casiano King, was born on August 13, 1933, in Manila, where he has resided since birth. He is employed as a sales supervisor at the Pacific Glass Company, earning a basic monthly salary of P500.00, with an annual income approximating P10,000.00. King's current citizenship is with Nationalist China, where he is married to a Chinese national, Ko Le Tin, with whom he has one child, Cary King.

Evidence Presented

In support of his petition for naturalization, King provided evidence demonstrating that he can speak and write English and Tagalog, and he professes allegiance to the principles of the Philippine Constitution. He described his social integration with Filipinos and articulated a sincere intention to learn and adopt their customs and traditions. Furthermore, he claimed not to be affiliated with any groups opposing organized government, and he has not been convicted of any crime of moral turpitude or suffer from any contagious diseases.

Initial Ruling and Reconsideration

The Court of First Instance denied King's petition on August 29, 1961, primarily because the character witnesses he presented did not sufficiently demonstrate that he had maintained an irreproachable conduct throughout his residence in the Philippines. King subsequently filed a motion for reconsideration on September 19, 1961, which the trial court denied on September 23, 1961, leading to the current appeal.

Legal Issue

The central issue under review is whether the character witnesses are required to affirm that the petitioner has conducted himself properly during his entire residence in the Philippines. The pertinent statutory provisions include Section 2, paragraph 3, and the second sentence of Section 7 of the Revised Naturalization Law.

Relevant Legal Provisions

Section 2, paragraph 3 specifies that a petitioner must demonstrate good moral character and that his conduct during his residence in the Philippines reflects this. Additionally, Section 7 stipulates that the petition must be backed by affidavits from at least two credible witnesses, stating that the petitioner is a resident and that they consider him to possess the necessary qualifications for citizenship.

Witness Testimonial Requirements

It is pertinent to note that the character witnesses must have known the petitioner during his entire period of residence to qualify as credible attestants. As previously established in similar cases, the witnesses presented by King only became acquainted with him in 1939 and 1947, hence they were not in a position to vouch for his conduct prior to their acquaintance, which is a substantial requirement for a successful naturalization petition.

Financial Consideration for Lucrative Occupation

The financial qualification requir

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.