Title
IN RE: Hong Chiong Yu vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-20895
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1969
Ramon Yu, a Chinese-born Philippine resident, sought naturalization but was denied due to insufficient income, failing to meet the lucrative occupation requirement under the Naturalization Law.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-20895)

Applicable Law and Naturalization Requirements

The core issue revolves around the petitioner’s application for naturalization under Philippine law, specifically the requirements set forth in the Naturalization Law, which necessitates that any applicant must possess a lucrative occupation or calling. The requirement aims to ensure that an applicant has a stable financial standing that allows them to support themselves and contribute to the community as a citizen.

Background of the Petition

The petitioner filed his naturalization petition on October 13, 1959, claiming an annual income of P1,800.00 from his job as a salesman at the Globe Bicycle Store in Manila. Two witnesses, former Congressman Conrado Morente and Mayor Dominador Madrid, testified to his good moral character, which is also a prerequisite for naturalization.

Grounds for Appeal

The Solicitor General appealed the court’s decision to grant the petition, asserting that the lower court erred based on several grounds: (1) Yu’s failure to disclose all former places of residence; (2) the inadequacy of his claimed annual income; and (3) the use of an alias without judicial authority. The appeal primarily focused on the insufficiency of the petitioner’s reported income as satisfying the necessary criteria for naturalization.

Court's Analysis of Income Sufficiency

The court noted that the applicant's declared income of P1,800.00, equivalent to P150.00 per month, is insufficient to meet the legal standard. Previous case law highlighted that this amount is below the threshold requirements established by similar rulings, which have consistently held that a minimum income of P200.00 per month is inadequate. Furthermore, even an additional income from tutorials that boosted his total monthly income to P250.00 was also deemed insufficient. The decisions referenced included several related cases where the courts invalidated petitions based on inadequate income levels.

Fi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.