Case Summary (A.M. No. 05-10-20-SC)
Relevant Legislative Background
The case arises from earlier resolutions by the Court dated December 6, 2005, and October 27, 2009. In 2005, the Court resolved that the NPC was exempt from payment of filing fees based on Republic Act No. 6395, which revised the NPC's Charter. However, this ruling was challenged, leading to the Court's 2009 decision, which retracted the exemption, asserting that NPC’s claim violated constitutional principles regarding the rule-making powers of the Supreme Court.
Constitutional Principles Involved
The Court highlighted Section 5(5), Article VIII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which delineates the Supreme Court's exclusive authority to promulgate rules concerning pleading, practice, and procedure, including the authority to set legal fees. It was established that this power is no longer shared with Congress or the Executive Branch, thus affirming the independence of the judiciary in these matters.
Implications of Legal Exemptions
The Court referenced the specific provisions in Section 22 of Rule 141, which states that while the Republic of the Philippines and its agencies are generally exempted from legal fees, local government units and government-owned or controlled corporations do not enjoy the same exemption. This distinction further confirmed that the NPC, despite its status, is subject to the same procedural rules applicable to other entities.
Legislative Changes and Judicial Interpretation
The ruling emphasizes the evolution of the rule-making power of the Court as established through the different constitutions—specifically detailing how the 1987 Constitution removed the legislative power to alter judicial rules concerning pleading and practice. This historical context solidifies the Court’s position against any legislative attempt to exempt entities like NPC from legal fees.
Denial of Exemption Claim
Ultimately, the Supreme Court clarified that the NPC's request for exemption from payment of legal fees under Republic Act No. 6395, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 938, is
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. No. 05-10-20-SC)
Case Overview
- The case concerns the National Power Corporation's (NPC) request for clarification on its exemption from the payment of filing fees, appeal bonds, and supersedeas bonds.
- The Supreme Court previously addressed this issue in A.M. No. 05-10-20-SC on December 6, 2005, affirming NPC's exemption based on Section 13 of Republic Act No. 6395, which revises the NPC Charter.
- However, a subsequent resolution on October 27, 2009, contradicted this exemption, leading to further clarification.
Judicial Resolutions and Recommendations
- On October 27, 2009, the Supreme Court denied NPC's request for exemption from filing fees, citing the constitutional authority of the Court to regulate procedural rules.
- The Court's recommendation hinged on Section 5(5), Article VIII of the Constitution, which grants the Supreme Court the exclusive power to establish rules on pleading, practice, and procedure, including the determination of filing