Title
IN RE: Cruz vs. Cruz
Case
G.R. No. L-8622
Decision Date
Aug 15, 1956
Mother seeks custody of daughter via habeas corpus after grandmother refuses to return her; SC rules in favor of mother, upholding parental rights.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-8622)

Facts of the Case

The case originated when Nita Flores applied for a writ of habeas corpus to regain custody of her daughter, Asuncion, who had been living with Felisa Cruz. After a month, Nita requested Asuncion to return, but Felisa denied this request. The initial petition for habeas corpus was filed in October 1954 at the Court of First Instance of Rizal. Felisa Cruz testified that Asuncion was free to leave her home and was not being restrained. Asuncion corroborated this testimony, leading the lower court to dismiss the case.

Legal Issues

The primary legal question addressed was whether a parent may obtain a writ of habeas corpus when a minor, acting voluntarily and without coercion, chooses to remain in the custody of a third party. This matter hinges upon the interpretation of parental rights and the custody of minors under the Civil Code of the Philippines.

Precedent and Legal Reasoning

The decision referenced several precedents, including Salvana vs. Gaeta and Reyes vs. Alvarez, establishing that a writ of habeas corpus may be granted even if the minor is living freely with another party, provided no physical restraint is involved. The essence of the argument relies on the incumbency of parental authority and the entitlements that accompany it.

In Salvana, the court articulated that parents inherently possess the right to custody of their children unless compelling reasons dictate otherwise. In contrast, the case at hand revealed that Nita Flores had consistently had custody of Asuncion, counter to the argument presented by the respondent.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court of the Philippines ul

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.