Title
IN RE: Chua Siong Hua vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-21400
Decision Date
May 31, 1966
William Chua Siong Hua's naturalization petition denied due to dubious income, identity discrepancies, and failure to comply with legal requirements, rendering him unworthy of Filipino citizenship.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-21400)

Relevant Background

On July 19, 1960, the Court of First Instance, presided by Judge Higinio B. Macadaeg, granted Chua Siong Hua's application for naturalization without opposition from the government. The court established that the petitioner was born in Manila on November 1, 1938, had never left the Philippines, was employed at Globe Electrical Supply with an annual income of P3,000, and possessed adequate knowledge of English and Tagalog. The court confirmed that he met all requirements for naturalization.

Motion to Take Oath and Opposition

Two years after the initial ruling, on September 24, 1962, the petitioner filed a motion to take the oath of allegiance as a Filipino citizen, as required by Republic Act No. 530. This time, the Republic opposed the motion, citing several grounds: lack of a lucrative occupation, failure to register and obtain a Certificate of Residence from the Bureau of Immigration, and discrepancies in his identity linked to conflicting dates of birth and aliases.

Court's Findings

On April 19, 1963, the lower court, under Judge Jose L. Moya, denied the motion for the oath. The ground for rejection was the petitioner's claimed monthly income of P250, which the court regarded as simulated. The court highlighted inconsistencies and questionable circumstances surrounding the petitioner's employment and income since he worked for a business owned by his father. The court emphasized the unrealism of such a salary for a young student, suggesting that it was a mere pretense to satisfy legal requirements.

Discrepancies and Aliases

The court noted significant inconsistencies regarding the petitioner's identity. Chua Siong Hua claimed to have been known as "William" in certain contexts, yet did not consistently use this name in official records, including his educational registration. The variations in his purported date of birth further clouded his identity, as he pr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.