Title
IN RE: Chua Eng Hok vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-20479
Decision Date
Oct 29, 1965
Chua Eng Hok, a Chinese national, sought Philippine naturalization but was denied due to insufficient income (P4,000/year) to support his family, failing to meet the lucrative income requirement under the Naturalization Law.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-20479)

Background of the Petition

Chua Eng Hok filed his petition for naturalization on June 6, 1959. He claimed residency at 1764 Sisa St., Sampaloc, Manila, while disclosing previous residences in Tondo, San Pablo City, and Camarines Sur. He asserted his birth on March 14, 1925, in Chuansio, Chinkiang, China, and his current status as a subject of the Republic of China. Chua reported being married to Osmundita Avila Palomar, a Filipino citizen, and indicated he had four children. He also declared an annual income of P4,000 from his employment at the Central Manufacturing Corporation and professed his belief in the principles of the Philippine Constitution.

Naturalization Law and Its Implications

Under the Naturalization Law, specifically Commonwealth Act No. 473 as amended by Republic Act No. 530, the decision in naturalization cases is not final until two years have elapsed. Consequently, on October 12, 1962, the Republic filed a petition to object to Chua's oath-taking as a citizen, citing grounds such as failure to disclose all former residences, publication of notice in a newspaper lacking general circulation, and insufficient income.

Grounds for Opposition to Naturalization

The objections raised by the Republic included the petitioner’s omission of former residences, the choice of newspaper for the notice, and the assertion that an annual income of P4,000 supporting a family of six was insufficiently lucrative. The Court noted the argument regarding income as particularly compelling, referencing previous cases that established a threshold for what constitutes a lucrative occupation.

Judicial Reasoning on Naturalization Income

The Court referred to past decisions, concluding that a yearly income of P4,000 is inadequate for a family of Chua's size. Specifically, the Court cited similar cases where similar income levels did not satisfy the naturalization requirements. It reiterated the principle that citizenship is a significant and valued status, necessitating strict a

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.