Case Summary (A.M. No. 24-04-09-SC)
Violent Incidents Against Judiciary Members
Significant violent incidents against judges underscore the necessity for enhanced protection. Judges, including Reymar Lacaya, Mario Anacleto BaAez, Exequil Dagala, and Ma. Theresa Abadilla, were tragically murdered in separate incidents, reflecting a disturbing trend of violence against judicial figures. Reporting highlights that a substantial number of judges have been killed while in service, with many cases remaining unresolved and the assailants unidentified.
Legislative Response to Judicial Threats
In response to the alarming rise in violence against judicial officials, Senator Richard Gordon proposed Senate Bill No. 1947 to create an armed unit similar to the U.S. Marshal Service. This was corroborated by the testimonies of various senators during legislative discussions, highlighting the urgency for protective measures in light of the increasing number of judicial killings and insufficient resolutions to these cases.
Objectives of the Judiciary Marshals Act
The objectives of the Judiciary Marshals Act include the protection of judiciary members, securing judicial properties, and ensuring an unimpeded administration of justice. The Act draws inspiration from the foundational role of U.S. Marshals in protecting federal jurists and assisting in legal enforcement.
Creation and Mandate of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals
The Office of the Judiciary Marshals is mandated to secure the safety and integrity of court operations and personnel. Its functions extend to conducting threat assessments, investigating crimes against judiciary members, and managing asset forfeitures. The Office operates under the oversight of the Supreme Court to ensure compliance with the law and effective risk management.
Implementing Rules and Regulations
The Supreme Court promulgated implementing rules that define the organization, functions, and operations of the Office. The Implementing Rules and Regulations delineate the roles of judicial marshals, enabling them to conduct investigations, protect members of the judiciary, and uphold the integrity of judicial processes.
Recruitment, Training, and Appointment of Marshals
The legislation outlines specific qualifications and training for judiciary marshals and establishes the Judiciary Marshals Academy to enhance their capabilities. The Chief Marshal, appointed by the Supreme Court, oversees the marshals and is responsible for their operational effectiveness.
Administrative Framework and Responsibilities
The structure of t
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. No. 24-04-09-SC)
Introduction and Background
- The case resolves the promulgation of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of Republic Act No. 11691, also known as the Judiciary Marshals Act.
- The Judiciary’s role in upholding the rule of law requires members to be free from threats inimical to the exercise of their judicial functions.
- Due to increasing violent crimes against members of the Judiciary, the Supreme Court sought and Congress enacted a law creating an independent body tasked to protect Judiciary members, personnel, and court properties.
Violent Crimes Against Members of the Judiciary
- Several judges have been victims of fatal attacks from 2019 to 2020, illustrating a disturbing pattern:
- Judge Reymar Lacaya of RTC Zamboanga del Norte was shot and killed in 2019.
- Judge Mario Anacleto BaAez of RTC Ilocos Sur was killed by motorcycle-riding assailants in 2019.
- Former Judge Exequil Dagala was shot dead inside his house.
- Judge Ma. Theresa Abadilla of RTC Manila was killed inside her chamber by a court employee.
- The deaths cited represent only a fraction of over 33 to 34 judges killed while in service.
- Less than 10% of such cases have been resolved, many without identified instigators.
- The Supreme Court and legal community have condemned these acts and sought institutional improvements for protection.
Creation of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals
- Inspired by the United States Marshal Service, the Supreme Court advocated the creation of a battalion-sized independent armed unit.
- Senate Bill No. 1947 and House Bill No. 9086 were introduced to establish a Judiciary Marshals Service.
- The bills highlighted alarming figures of killings and unresolved cases involving judges, prosecutors, and lawyers.
- The Judiciary Marshals Service was designed to protect Judiciary members and personnel from violence and undue influence, secure Judiciary properties, and support judicial independence.
- Republic Act No. 11691, the Judiciary Marshals Act, was enacted on April 28, 2022.
Mandate and Powers of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals
- The Office is tasked primarily with the security, safety, and protection of Judiciary officials, personnel, properties, and court proceedings.
- It is empowered to:
- Conduct threat assessments and investigations on offenses against Judiciary members and properties.
- Investigate graft, corruption, and irregularities among Ju