Title
Ilustricimo vs. NYK-Fil Ship Management, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 237487
Decision Date
Jun 27, 2018
Seafarer Ilustricimo, diagnosed with bladder cancer during employment, sought disability benefits. Despite employer resistance, the Supreme Court ruled his illness work-related, reinstated total disability benefits, emphasizing labor protection and employer's failure in medical referral process.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 237487)

Factual Antecedents

Aldrine Ilustrimicmo served as a Quarter Master for the respondents from 1993 until his last employment in April 2014 on the vessel MV Crystal Serenity. Prior to his embarkation, a Pre-Employment Medical Examination confirmed his fitness for work. Onboard the vessel, he began experiencing gross hematuria and subsequently received a diagnosis of bladder cancer, leading to his medical repatriation and treatment, including chemotherapy. His company-designated physician assessed him with a Grade 7 disability rating, indicating moderate residuals from his condition.

Ruling of the Voluntary Arbitrators

On October 25, 2016, the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators rendered a decision granting Ilustrimicmo total and permanent disability benefits amounting to $95,949, stating that his sickness was work-related, either due to occupational exposure or other risk factors. Subsequently, the respondents appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals modified the Voluntary Arbitrators’ decision, ruling that Ilustrimicmo was only entitled to partial permanent disability benefits amounting to $40,106.98. The appellate court reasoned that Ilustrimicmo failed to provide sufficient medical documentation to support his claim, particularly the absence of a second doctor’s opinion and a referral to a third doctor, which are requirements under the Philippine Overseas Employment Agency Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC).

Issue

The core issue at hand is whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that Ilustrimicmo was not entitled to total and permanent disability benefits.

Assessment of Work-Related Illness

To determine whether Ilustrimicmo's illness was compensable, it must be established that his condition was work-related, as outlined in Section 20(A) of the POEA-SEC. The court reiterated the principle that it is not necessary for work to be the sole cause of the illness; a reasonable link between the employment and the illness suffices. In this case, since Ilustrimicmo's diagnosis included risk factors such as occupational exposure to certain chemicals, the Voluntary Arbitrators’ conclusion about the work-related nature of his illness was upheld.

Compliance with Third-Doctor Referral Requirement

The respondents contended that Ilustrimicmo breached his obligations by not properly invoking the third-doctor provision of the POEA-SEC. However, the court found that the respondents received notice of Ilustrimicmo's intent to contest the company's medical assessment and failed to activate the referral process in a timely manner. Thus, the non-referral could not be attributed to Ilustrimicmo.

Entitlement to Total and Permanent Disability Benefits

The court reviewed the findings regarding the nature of Ilustrimicmo's disability, with emphasis on the serious implications of his illness and the ongoing m

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.