Title
Supreme Court
Hontiveros-Baraquel vs. Toll Regulatory Board
Case
G.R. No. 181293
Decision Date
Feb 23, 2015
Petitioners challenged the validity of the ASTOA and TOC, alleging unconstitutionality and government disadvantage. The Supreme Court upheld the TRB's authority, validated the TOC, and dismissed the petition, ruling only labor unions had standing and claims lacked evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 181293)

Key Dates

• 1977: TRB created by P.D. 1112; PNCC franchise granted under P.D. 1113.
• 1995: Supplemental Toll Operation Agreement (STOA) with CMMTC and PSC.
• July–December 2007: Amendment to STOA (ASTOA), Secretary’s approval, Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), and Toll Operation Certificate (TOC) issued to SOMCO.
• January 2008: Labor strike notice and filings before the Department of Labor and the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
• February 2008: Original petition for certiorari filed with the Supreme Court.
• October 2015: Decision rendered under the 1987 Constitution.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (post-1990 decision)
• Presidential Decrees Nos. 1112, 1113, 1894
• Republic Acts Nos. 6957 (as amended by 7718), 8975
• Executive Order No. 497
• Rules of Court Rule 65 (certiorari and prohibition) and Rule 17 (voluntary dismissal)

Issues Presented

  1. Which petitioners have legal standing?
  2. Whether forum-shopping occurred.
  3. TRB’s authority to grant toll-facility operating certificates.
  4. Validity and regularity of the TOC issued to SOMCO.
  5. Validity of the Secretary of Transportation’s approval of the ASTOA.
  6. Whether the transfer of operations to SOMCO was grossly disadvantageous to the government.

Standing to Sue

Only the two labor unions (PSCEU and PTMSDWO) are real parties in interest. As their employer (PSC) ceased operations, the unions face dissolution and member retrenchment. Other petitioners lack personal or substantial interest in challenging the government contracts.

Forum-Shopping

No forum-shopping is established. The labor dispute before the Department of Labor involves allegations of unfair labor practice and retrenchment, distinct from the contractual and regulatory challenges pursued before the RTC and Supreme Court. The RTC case was voluntarily dismissed with confirmation before this petition was filed.

TRB’s Authority to Grant Toll-Facility Certificates

Under P.D. 1112 (Section 3[e]) and P.D. 1894 (Section 4), the TRB may, subject to presidential approval, enter contracts for toll-facility construction, operation, and maintenance, and issue Toll Operation Certificates (TOCs) with prescribed conditions. The PNCC franchise was neither exclusive nor immune to amendment; exclusivity was a contractual term in the STOA and was lawfully modified by the ASTOA.

Validity of the TOC Issued to SOMCO

Conditions required by P.D. 1112 are implicitly incorporated in every TOC. Public bidding and hearings were unnecessary because SOMCO’s assumption was a contractual matter, not a new public procurement. SOMCO meets constitutional nationality requirements (60% Filipino ownership), as respondents’ unchallenged ownership matrices demonstrate.

Validity of the ASTOA Approval

Under the doctrine of qualified political agency, the Secretary of Transportation’s approval of the ASTOA (delegated by EO 497) constitutes presidential approval. PNCC did not lease, sell, or assign its franchise but entered a joint-venture modification under TRB’s contract-granting power in P.D. 1112.

Gross Disadvantage to the Government?

Allegations of “gross disadvantage” are speculative. SOMCO’s capitalization exceeds tha

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.