Title
Hierro vs. Nava II
Case
A.C. No. 9459
Decision Date
Jan 7, 2020
Atty. Nava disbarred for representing conflicting interests and engaging in an adulterous relationship with a client’s wife, violating professional and moral standards.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 239350)

Antecedents

Rene J. Hierro filed an administrative complaint for disbarment against Atty. Plaridel C. Nava II on May 9, 2012, which alleged multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The complaint culminated in charges for conflict of interest, grossly immoral conduct, and dereliction of duty. The pivotal allegations included Atty. Nava representing Hierro’s spouse in a domestic legal matter while having previously represented Hierro, engaging in an adulterous relationship with her, and allegedly abandoning Hierro as counsel in a criminal case leading to his conviction.

Respondent's Position

Atty. Nava denied the allegations, asserting that his actions regarding the issuance of a temporary protection order (TPO) were limited and based on exigent circumstances involving the safety of Hierro's spouse and her children. He maintained that the information used in the TPO petition was publicly available and not confidential. Regarding the allegation of gross immorality, Atty. Nava claimed that the complaint was baseless, highlighting that an earlier case of adultery against him had been dismissed due to lack of merit. He contended that he had not abandoned Hierro, who he claimed terminated his services.

Report and Recommendation

The Investigating Commissioner, Rommel V. Cuison, recommended disbarment based on the gravity of Atty. Nava’s alleged misconduct. This recommendation was later adopted by the IBP Board of Governors, emphasizing the need for serious penalties in cases involving breach of the lawyer's ethical obligations.

Court’s Ruling

Upon review, the Court adopted the IBP's recommendation, citing the clear violations of Canons 15.03 and 7.03 of the Code. Canon 15.03 prohibits lawyers from representing clients with conflicting interests without written consent, underscoring the importance of trust in the lawyer-client relationship. The Court found that Atty. Nava had indeed represented conflicting interests by acting for both Hierro and his wife in matters directly opposing each other, which compromised the ethical standards expected of a lawyer.

Conflict of Interest Violation

Atty. Nava's representation of Annalyn Hierro in the TPO petition created a conflict because it utilized information from his previous representation of Hierro, inherently suggesting wrongdoing on Hierro’s part while simultaneously defending him in multiple criminal cases. This conflicting representation led to a breach of trust and professional ethics, warranting disciplinary action.

Findings on Immoral Conduct

The Court examined the allegations of gross immorality against Atty. Nava, ultimately concluding that his conduct met the criteria for grossly immoral conduct as it revealed a blatant disregard for decency and integrity within the at

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.