Title
Heirs of Pajares vs. North Sea Marine Services Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 244437
Decision Date
Sep 14, 2020
Seafarer diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma denied disability benefits; SC ruled illness not work-related but awarded $8,500 financial assistance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 244437)

Applicable Law

The relevant legal framework governing this case is dictated by the 1987 Philippine Constitution, as the case decision date falls in 2020. Additionally, the Labor Code and the contractual obligations arising from seafarers' employment agreements are crucial in determining the rights of the parties involved.

Employment and Medical Background

Amadeo Pajares was employed as a Suite Attendant on board the cruise ship Silver Whisper, earning a basic monthly salary of USD 477.00. During his employment, he was exposed to potentially harmful cleaning chemicals, which he and his heirs believe contributed to his health deterioration. Following a severe nosebleed, Amadeo was diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma, a type of blood cancer, by a company-designated physician. Despite seeking further medical clarification and a second opinion, he faced challenges in obtaining medical documentation from his employer, which ultimately led to complications regarding his claims for benefits.

Findings of the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators

The Panel of VAs initially dismissed the complaint from Amadeo concerning his disability benefits, stating that he had not provided sufficient evidence linking his illness to his work. They upheld the findings of the company-designated physician which concluded that Amadeo's condition was not work-related. Furthermore, significant weight was given to the medical report from the employer’s physician, whereas evidence from an independent physician was discounted due to the lateness of its submission. Despite the dismissal of claims for permanent disability benefits, the Panel awarded a financial assistance of USD 20,000.00 on humanitarian grounds.

Court of Appeals' Ruling

Upon appeal by North Sea regarding the financial assistance awarded, the Court of Appeals (CA) upheld the Panel of VAs' findings while modifying the financial assistance award to USD 8,500.00. The CA found that the heirs of Amadeo did not properly appeal for a reversal of the decision concerning disability benefits, as such claims were not included in the initial appeal made by North Sea. The petitioners' subsequent claims—including the legitimacy of their request for total disability benefits and other grievances related to due process—were not regarded favorably as they were not litigated in the prior proceedings.

Supreme Court's Decision

The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the CA, reiterating that non-appellants are not entitled to affirmative relief after failing to appeal. The distinctions made by the Panel of VAs were upheld concerning the lack of evidence offered by petitioners against the employer’s medical findings, which sufficiently showed that Amadeo’s illness was not aggravated by his employment as a Suite Attendant. The refusal

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.