Title
Heirs of Licua vs. Singa Ship Management, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 238261
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2019
Seafarer diagnosed with work-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma post-repatriation; heirs awarded death benefits despite death occurring after employment termination.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 238261)

Facts

On January 27, 2012, Manolo signed a nine-month employment contract with Singa Ship Management, Inc. to work as a chef de partie on board the vessel "Queen Mary 2." After experiencing health issues characterized by difficulty swallowing solid food and persistent cough, he was evaluated in Hamburg, where he was diagnosed with a large ulcerted mass in his nasopharynx. Following medical repatriation to the Philippines on July 27, 2012, he received a definitive diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and underwent treatment from a company-designated physician, who later assigned him a disability rating of Grade 7 post-treatment. Tragically, Manolo died on February 15, 2014, prompting his heirs to file a complaint against his employer for the recovery of death benefits, claiming that his illness was work-related.

Labor Arbiter's Ruling

The Labor Arbiter ruled in February 2015 that SSMI and affiliated companies were jointly and severally liable for disability benefits totaling $50,000 for permanent total disability, plus $14,000 for his two children. The Arbiter determined that Manolo's condition was work-related due to his poor dietary conditions aboard the vessel, and the disability rating contradicted statements of non-work-related illness.

NLRC Ruling

The National Labor Relations Commission issued a decision on January 29, 2016, reversing the Labor Arbiter's ruling. It concluded that the Heirs of Manolo were not entitled to death benefits, as his death occurred more than a year after termination of employment due to medical repatriation. However, it permitted the possibility of filing a separate action for disability benefits.

CA Ruling

The Court of Appeals, in October 2017, reversed the NLRC ruling concerning disability benefits, ordering SSMI to provide a benefit total of $20,900, while upholding the lack of entitlement to death benefits. The CA affirmed that the company-designated physician had sufficiently established a work-related connection to Manolo's illness.

Issues Before the Court

The primary issue examined was the CA's award of disability benefits to the Heirs of Manolo. SSMI contended that the CA erred in awarding these benefits, asserting the illness was not work-related. Conversely, the Heirs claimed that the CA should have awarded death compensation benefits, given that Manolo's death resulted from a work-related injury.

Court's Ruling

The Court denied SSMI's petition while granting the Heirs' petition. It emphasized that despite Manolo's death occurring post-repatriation, his death resulted from a work-related illness, thus satisfying the criteria for compensation under the 2010 POEA Standard Employment Contract. The Court noted that the presumption of work-relatedness was not effectively rebutted by SSMI, and reiterated that a disability rating typically signifies a work-related injury, which, in this case, was established by the designated physician's consistent assessments.

Work-Rela

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.