Title
Heirs of Cullado vs. Gutierrez
Case
G.R. No. 212938
Decision Date
Jul 30, 2019
Land dispute between Dominic Gutierrez and Alfredo Cullado over possession and ownership; CA reversed RTC’s reconveyance order, affirming Dominic’s title, ruling RTC lacked jurisdiction in accion publiciana.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 212938)

Key Dates

May 10, 1995 – Free patent and issuance of Original Certificate of Title (OCT) P-61499 in Dominic’s favor
May 5, 1997 – Filing of an accion publiciana by Dominic (through his father) in RTC, Branch 22, Cabagan, Isabela
May 18, 2010 – RTC decision dismissing Dominic’s complaint and ordering reconveyance to the heirs of Cullado
March 18, 2011 – Dominic’s petition for relief from judgment denied as late
October 18, 2011 – Petition for annulment of judgment filed in the Court of Appeals (CA)
December 6, 2013 – CA decision reversing the RTC and granting annulment
May 27, 2014 – CA denial of motion for reconsideration
July 30, 2019 – Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

1987 Philippine Constitution; Rules of Court (Rules 45, 47, 70, 141); Property Registration Decree (PD 1529); Commonwealth Act No. 141 (Public Land Act); Civil Code

Facts of the Case

Dominic obtained a Torrens title over an 18,280 m² parcel in Aneg, Delfin Albano, Isabela. In 1997, his father filed an accion publiciana for recovery of possession against Alfredo Cullado, alleging squatting since 1977. Cullado asserted in his answer that he had cultivated the land in open, adverse, continuous possession and counterclaimed for reconveyance on grounds of fraud in Dominic’s title. Cullado died; his heirs continued the defense.

Procedural History

RTC granted Cullado’s heirs relief, dismissing Dominic’s complaint and ordering reconveyance. Dominic’s petition for relief from judgment was denied as late. He then filed for annulment of judgment in the CA, which granted annulment for lack of jurisdiction in the RTC to order reconveyance in an accion publiciana. The heirs of Cullado elevated the matter to the Supreme Court via Rule 45 petition.

Issue

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in annulling the RTC decision and holding that the RTC lacked jurisdiction to order reconveyance in an accion publiciana.

Ruling on Annulment of Judgment

The CA properly admitted annulment under Rule 47 for lack of jurisdiction, since Dominic, without fault, had exhausted ordinary remedies (petition for relief). Lack of jurisdiction is a valid ground irrespective of laches or estoppel when timely asserted.

Nature of Remedies for Recovery of Possession

Three actions exist:
• Accion interdictal (summary ejectment) – for forcible entry or unlawful detainer within one year;
• Accion publiciana – for better right of possession after one year;
• Accion reivindicatoria – for recovery of ownership.

An accion publiciana may provisionally resolve ownership only to decide possession; it cannot definitively alter a Torrens title or order reconveyance.

Accion Publiciana and Ownership Issues

In an accion publiciana, a defendant’s challenge to the plaintiff’s title does not constitute a collateral attack on Torrens certificates because such resolution is provisional and limited to possession. The RTC exceeded its jurisdiction by definitively ruling on ownership, declaring reacquisitive prescription in favor of Cullado’s heirs, and ordering reconveyance. Their counterclaims for fraud and reconveyance were mischaracterized as affirmative defenses; such claims, if properly raised as permissive counterclaims, required separate fees to confer jurisdiction.

Applicability of the Torrens System

Dominic’s OCT became indefeasible one year after issuance (PD 1529, Sec. 32). Challenges based on fraud after that period are barred except via direct proceed

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.