Title
Heirs of Bernabe vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 154402
Decision Date
Jul 21, 2008
Heirs of Bernabe contested Titan Construction's claim over co-owned land, alleging non-compliance with payment terms. Courts upheld Titan's partial performance, ordering heirs to execute a deed of sale upon full payment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 154402)

Background of the Case

This case arose from a complaint for specific performance initiated by Titan Construction Corporation against the late Antonio F. Bernabe and his siblings regarding an undivided one-half share in two parcels of land in Parañaque, Metro Manila. The parties had entered into a notarial Deed of Sale, wherein the defendants sold their land share to Titan. Disputes arose surrounding the performance of the contract, particularly regarding the down payment and necessary conditions for the completion of the sale.

Nature of the Contract and Disputes

The primary contention between the parties is the interpretation of the Deed of Sale and the subsequent Deed of Conditional Sale. Petitioners argue that the proper obligations were not fulfilled by Titan, maintaining that the contracts in question were conditional and Titan must make full payment before title could be transferred. Conversely, Titan asserted that a perfected contract of sale existed and it was entitled to demand performance.

Death of Antonio and Compromise Agreement

Following the death of Antonio, a compromise agreement was reached between Titan and the remaining defendants, which prompted the execution of several conditional sale deeds. These deeds were executed by the heirs of Antonio and purportedly authorized by a power of attorney executed by Antonio before his demise, creating additional legal complexities regarding authorization and the effective transfer of property rights.

Judicial Proceedings and Rulings

The Regional Trial Court decided in favor of Titan, affirming that the contracts were valid and that petitioners had not proven any breach on Titan's part that would justify rescission. The RTC specifically ordered the heirs to execute a registrable deed of sale upon payment of the remaining purchase price, leading to the appellate proceedings where the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Issues Presented

Petitioners presented two key legal issues for resolution:

  1. Whether Titan could compel the vendors to execute a registerable deed of sale despite not having paid the full purchase price.
  2. Whether the vendors could seek rescission on the grounds of Titan's failure to fulfill contractual obligations.

Analysis of the Contracts

The court found that the Deed of Conditional Sale superseded the earlier Deed of Sale, indicating an intent not to transfer ownership until certain conditions were met. The distinction between "contract to sell" and "contract of sale" was highlighted, noting that ownership would remain with the vendor until payments were made as stipulated. Thus, while Titan had made substantial payments, the court clarified that obligations under the terms of the Deed of Conditional Sale had not been fully met.

Court'

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.