Title
Haw Liong vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-21194
Decision Date
Apr 29, 1966
Petitioner Haw Liong sought to change his name to Alfonso Lantin, citing cultural alignment and familial ties, but the Supreme Court denied the petition, ruling no compelling reason justified the change.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 127936)

Case Background

Haw Liong filed a petition before the Court of First Instance of Leyte seeking to change his name to Alfonso Lantin. The petitioner, a 47-year-old married man residing in Tacloban City for over 20 years, expressed his desire to adopt a Filipino name in anticipation of becoming a Filipino citizen. He testified to his longstanding association with the name Alfonso, which his Filipino friends used to call him, linking it to his father’s name, Placido Lantin.

Court’s Initial Ruling

The lower court granted Haw Liong’s request to change his name to Alfonso Lantin. However, this decision was met with opposition from the government, which appealed the ruling, arguing the necessity for a compelling reason for such a change.

Legal Principles on Name Change

The Supreme Court reiterated that the State has a vested interest in the names individuals carry, primarily for identification purposes. Changing one’s name is seen as a privilege rather than an inherent right. Jurisprudence outlines that one must present a reasonable cause to justify the change of name, which includes but is not limited to the following instances: an inappropriate or dishonorable name, a change coinciding with a change of status, or the avoidance of confusion.

Assessment of Petitioner’s Justifications

Upon review, the Supreme Court found that Haw Liong did not provide sufficient evidence of a compelling reason beyond his desire to adopt the name Alfonso Lantin. His justification—that he is called Alfonso by Filipino friends and wishes to honor his father’s name—lacked substantiation when juxtaposed against the legal requirement that a name change must fulfill specific conditions.

Analysis of Evidence

The Court observed that, despite Haw Liong's claims, he had consistently engaged in business under his original name and had only adopted 'Alfonso' during social interactions prompted by friends during the Japanese occupation. The petitioner's testimony did not sufficiently counterbalance the official designation of his name established at birth, as evidenced by his landing certific

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.