Title
Hamlin vs. Collector of Internal Revenue
Case
G.R. No. L-12991
Decision Date
Dec 23, 1959
Hamlin contested a deficiency tax on a 1950 imported car, claiming payment before a rate hike. Court ruled payment was made post-hike, applying the 50% rate upon withdrawal.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-12991)

Background Facts

On September 17, 1950, the S/S President Wilson imported a Mercury automobile, which was consigned to Hamlin. The automobile arrived in Cebu on September 21, 1950, via the F/S Albert. Hamlin subsequently took possession of the vehicle from the customs authority on September 23, 1950, after remitting a compensating tax amounting to P927.95, calculated at a rate of 15% of the automobile’s total value, as substantiated by an official receipt dated September 22, 1950.

Legal Framework and Tax Imposition

The pivotal legal framework in this case is anchored on Republic Act 588, which amended the compensating tax to 50% effective from September 22, 1950. In 1954, the Collector of Internal Revenue sought to impose a deficiency tax of P2,164.31, arguing that the applicable tax rate at the time of withdrawal (September 23, 1950) was indeed 50%, as the tax liability was triggered upon the removal of the automobile from customs custody.

Petitioner’s Arguments

Hamlin contended that he should only be liable for the 15% rate, asserting that the tax payment was made on September 21, 1950, despite the date on the receipt reflecting September 22, 1950. His arguments were supported by testimonies from employees who purportedly corroborated his claim regarding the payment date.

Court's Findings and Reasoning

The Court of Tax Appeals rejected Hamlin’s assertions, emphasizing the legal stipulation in Section 190 of the Tax Code, which necessitated the tax to be paid upon the withdrawal or removal of goods from customs custody. The Court determined that since the removal of the automobile occurred on September 23, 1950, the tax due was correctly calculated at the prevailing rate of 50%. The Tax Court found the testimonies presented by Hamlin to be unconvincing and aligned with the documentation that indicated the tax was paid on September 22, 1950.

Conclusion of the Court

The High Court upheld the findings of t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.