Title
Grey vs. Insular Lumber Co.
Case
G.R. No. L-7777
Decision Date
Oct 31, 1955
A dispute arose over attorney’s fees after a company paid a judgment debt; the Supreme Court ruled the claim must be resolved in probate court, ensuring due process for the estate’s administratrix.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 113447)

Case Background

The case originated when M. E. Grey initiated a legal action against Insular Lumber Company to recover a monetary sum. Following Grey's death, Ruth Grey was appointed administratrix of the estate and substituted as the plaintiff in the ongoing action. The trial court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and Insular Lumber Company issued a check in the amount of P88,453.56, made payable to Ruth Grey, which was subsequently delivered to Atty. Carlos Hilado, representing the plaintiff.

Attorney's Fee Dispute

Atty. Hilado filed a motion to collect a contingent fee totaling 25% of the judgment amount, which equated to P22,113.89. Hilado argued that as per his contract with M. E. Grey, he was entitled to this fee and requested that a second check be issued directly to him. Insular Lumber Company opposed the motion, contending that it had fulfilled its obligation by issuing the check to the administratrix and that any claims for attorney's fees should be filed in the probate proceedings.

Court's Decision and Implications

The trial court, upon reviewing Hilado's motion, ruled in his favor, recorded the attorney's lien, and ordered the company to issue two separate checks. The company subsequently appealed the order, raising concerns about the appropriateness of the trial court's decision, pointing out it had no vested interest in the estate's distribution.

Legal Considerations and Lien Issues

The appellate court emphasized the principle that judgment debtors have fully complied with their obligations once payment is made. The court noted that while Atty. Hilado's lien was recognized, it had to be established that his claim was justified and that the legal representative of the estate—that is, administratrix Ruth Grey—had not been afforded an adequate opportunity to respond to Hilado's motion. The attorneys involved were required to ensure that the estate's representative had the chance to address any claims against the estate, particularly giv

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.