Title
Government of the Philippines vs. Molino
Case
G.R. No. L-8317
Decision Date
May 23, 1958
A 1933 cadastral case adjudicated Lot 382-C to Anselmo Molino, later sold to Aquino in 1938. Heirs contested, alleging mortgage, but court upheld sale, affirming cadastral court's limited jurisdiction and deed's validity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-8317)

Relevant Dates and Events

The original decision regarding Lot No. 382 was rendered on December 18, 1933, adjudicating portions of the lot to various parties. Following this decision, a deed of sale was executed on January 11, 1938, between Anselmo Molino and Calixto C. Aquino. The subdivision of Lot No. 382 occurred on August 21, 1941, but the corresponding subdivision plan was only approved on December 29, 1948, due to the Japanese occupation during World War II. Calixto C. Aquino filed a petition on August 17, 1951, to have the decree issued in his favor regarding Lot 382-C, which prompted the opposition by the Molino heirs.

Judicial Proceedings and Issues Raised

The Court of First Instance of Cagayan held that it lacked authority to resolve the issues raised by the Molinos, which were more appropriate for an ordinary civil action. Their opposition centered around the claim that the deed of sale executed was, in reality, a mortgage, alleging that Anselmo Molino's debt to Aquino had been satisfied. The court issued an order on November 28, 1952, affirming that Anselmo had sold Lot 382-C to Aquino and directed the issuance of the corresponding decree of registration.

Appellants' Arguments and Legal Basis

The Molino heirs appealed the lower court's decision, raising questions of law. They contended that the lower court erroneously dismissed their opposition and mischaracterized the transaction between Anselmo Molino and Aquino. They argued that the deed in question was not a valid sale but rather a secured transaction, asserting fraud and questioning the indefeasibility of Aquino’s alleged rights. They cited specific legal references, notably section 29 of Act No. 496, maintaining that the lower court’s conclusions about the sale's execution were flawed given the outstanding payment obligations.

Court's Analysis and Findings

The court assessed the legal validity of the deed of sale, determining that the title passed to Aquino upon execution of the document, irrespective of payment status. The court distinguished the limited jurisdiction of cadastral courts, emphasizing their inability to delve into the details of whether the agreement was genuinely reflective of the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.