Title
Go Bon Lee vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-21981
Decision Date
May 19, 1966
Wilfredo Go Bon Lee's Philippine citizenship revoked for failing to enroll his minor children in local schools, repeated petitions denied due to insufficient efforts and res judicata.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 224097)

Background of the Case

The petitioner sought Philippine citizenship through a petition filed before the Court of First Instance of Cebu. Previously, on August 15, 1951, the Solicitor General initiated a petition to cancel the certificate of naturalization previously granted to Go Bon Lee, primarily because he failed to enroll his minor children in a public or private school in the Philippines, as stipulated by the Naturalization Law. Following a subsequent appeal, the higher court revoked his certificate of naturalization, signifying the impact of his failure to meet the schooling requirements.

Previous Attempts and Legal Proceedings

After the revocation of his naturalization certificate, the petitioner filed a new petition on June 23, 1961, in an attempt to remedy the deficiencies identified in the prior case. However, the City Fiscal of Cebu reiterated the same grounds for opposition, emphasizing the petitioner’s failure to send his children to recognized educational institutions. After considering the evidence presented by both parties, the Court denied the petition and the petitioner subsequently appealed the decision.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The petitioner argued that he should be exempt from the schooling requirement due to significant challenges he faced in bringing his children to the Philippines. He contended that despite his efforts, circumstances beyond his control—including a lack of consent from his mother-in-law and travel-related health concerns—prevented him from fulfilling the requirements of the Naturalization Law.

Court’s Analysis and Findings

The Court found no merit in the petitioner’s claims. It highlighted that objections from the mother-in-law about the children’s health did not serve as a valid insurmountable obstacle to their migration. Additionally, the petitioner had traveled to China multiple times between 1924 and 1947, during which he could have made adequate arrangements for his children to come to the Philippines, especially before the Sino-Japanese War. The absence of a satisfactory explanation from the petitioner regarding his failure to bring his children was critical in the Court's decision.

Res Judicata Principle

The Court referenced its previous ruling that established that Go Bon Lee had not made significant efforts to brin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.