Title
Supreme Court
Gerodias vs. Riveral
Case
A.C. No. 12719
Decision Date
Feb 17, 2021
Former employee filed a disbarment complaint against lawyers, alleging conspiracy in his early retirement and labor case; Supreme Court dismissed the case for lack of merit.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 12719)

Disciplinary Background and Employment Termination

Gerodias faced multiple disciplinary investigations during his tenure at OPASCOR, due to incidents involving conflicts with colleagues, damage to company property, and ultimately, theft of client property, which led to a crisis in employment relations culminating in his voluntary retirement. Despite being short of the required years of service for early retirement, Gerodias was allowed to retire early on the approval of Riveral, treating the situation preferentially rather than opting for criminal charges or termination.

Legal Complaints and Outcomes

Following his retirement, Gerodias filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against OPASCOR, which resulted in a dismissal by the Labor Arbiter due to lack of merit, a decision subsequently upheld by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). Concurrently, Gerodias accused the respondents of colluding to improperly affect his employment status, alleging violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR).

Allegations of Professional Misconduct

Gerodias alleged that Riveral, Pulvera-Page, and Supatan conspired, along with Cadungog, the Labor Union President, to facilitate his termination. He cited conflicts of interest and inconsistencies in Secretary's Certificates submitted during the labor proceedings, asserting improper representation and ulterior motives behind the actions taken against him during the disciplinary process.

Respondents’ Defense and Findings

The respondents denied the conspiracy, affirming that Gerodias had voluntarily resigned and claimed that all actions taken were appropriate under the circumstances. Riveral highlighted his good faith in the retirement approval, while Pulvera-Page and Geyrosaga defended the legitimacy of the Secretary's Certificates signed by them, arguing that multiple signatories are permissible under OPASCOR’s by-laws.

Integrative Bar of the Philippines’ Report and Ruling

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) ultimately recommended the dismissal of Gerodias’ complaint against the respondents, concluding that there was no factual or legal basis for the accusations and asserting that there were no violations of the CPR, suggesting that Gerodias' claims were unsubstantiated.

Court’s Ruling on the Disbarment Complaint

The Court affirmed the IBP’s findings, emphasizing that a complainant must provide convincing evidence to substantiate claims of professional misconduct against lawyers, who are presumed innocent otherwise. The Court found no evidence of bad faith or malice related to Riveral’s approval of Gerodias’ retirement, highlighting that such actions fell within his authority as President of OPASCOR.

Evaluati

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.