Case Summary (G.R. No. L-8717)
Factual Background
On September 23, 1947, National Coconut Corporation sold to General Foods Corporation one thousand five hundred (1500), later reduced to one thousand (1000), long tons of copra at $164, later reduced to $163, per ton of two thousand (2000) pounds, under a written contract (Exhibit “A”) which quoted the price as CIF New York. The contract expressly incorporated the rules of the National Institute of Oilseeds Products, provided for shipment in November 1947, and allowed the seller an option of delivering five percent more or less than the contracted quantity with adjustment clauses tied to delivered weight and market price. The contract further specified “Net landed weights” as the governing measure and provided that the balance of price was to be paid “promptly upon ascertainment and based upon outturn weights and quality at port of discharge.” The buyer was to open an irrevocable letter of credit for ninety‑five percent of invoice value against specified shipping documents.
From November 14 to December 3, 1947, NACOCO shipped 1,054.6278 short tons of copra on board the S. S. “Mindoro.” The cargo was weighed in Manila by Luzon Brokerage Co., acting as agent of the General Superintendence Co., Ltd., by summing individual bag weights and subtracting an average tare determined from weighing a sample of empty bags. On the basis of those net weights NACOCO prepared shipping documents and drew $136,686.95, representing ninety‑five percent of invoice value, under the buyer’s letter of credit. Upon arrival in New York, General Foods reweighed the cargo and found the net weight to be 898.792 short tons. The buyer received $8,092.02 from its insurer for 58.25 long tons lost or destroyed prior to loading. General Foods demanded reimbursement from NACOCO of $24,154.59, representing the amount overdrawn on the letter of credit after outturn weights were ascertained.
Procedural History
After NACOCO acknowledged liability for the deficiency in a letter signed by officer‑in‑charge Jose Nieva, Sr. (Exhibit “B”), NACOCO was abolished and put into liquidation. General Foods submitted its claim to the Board of Liquidators, which refused payment. General Foods then sued in the Court of First Instance of Manila to recover $24,154.59, the 17 percent exchange tax required to remit that sum under Republic Act 529, attorney’s fees and costs. The trial court found for the defendant and dismissed the complaint. General Foods appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Parties’ Contentions
General Foods contended that despite the CIF New York notation, the contract contemplated final payment according to weight and quality upon arrival at New York; consequently the seller retained the risk until arrival and must refund the overdrawn amount based on the net landed weight. NACOCO argued that the transaction was an ordinary CIF sale in which delivery to the carrier, coupled with tender of the shipping documents and insurance, completed delivery and transferred risk to the buyer; having withdrawn ninety‑five percent of invoice under the letter of credit, it asserted that it had received payment and was not liable for the shortage.
Trial Court Ruling
The Court of First Instance found for the defendant and dismissed General Foods’ complaint. The trial court thereby accepted NACOCO’s position that the CIF terms and the drawing under the letter of credit consummated the sale and shifted the risk to the buyer.
Ruling of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the trial court. The Court ordered National Coconut Corporation to pay General Foods Corporation the equivalent in Philippine currency of $24,154.59, with legal interest from the filing of the complaint. The Court made no pronouncement as to costs.
Legal Basis and Reasoning
The Court began by stating the established rule that under an ordinary CIF contract delivery to the carrier and tender of the requisite shipping documents, including insurance, will pass property and risk to the buyer. The Court, however, recognized the well‑settled principle that parties may by express stipulation alter that rule and place the risk upon the seller until arrival and inspection at the port of destination. The contract before the Court, although quoting CIF New York and permitting the seller to draw ninety‑five percent of invoice on presentation of shipping documents, expressly provided that the “Net landed weights” would govern and that the balance of price was to be ascertained “upon outturn weights and quality at port of discharge.” The contract also allowed adjustment for a five percent variance in quantity, to be settled on the basis of delivered weight.
The Court relied on the rationale of the New York decision in Warner, Barnes & Co. v. Warner Sugar Refining Co., 192 NYS 151, cited in the briefs, where the court construed a similar contract to mean that although risk might pass upon presentation of shipping documents, the buyer was nevertheless obligated to pay according to landed weights and that the seller could not be deprived of the right to show diminution caused by voyage risks. The Supreme Court found that in the present case the parties’ manifest intention was that the total price be finally ascertained only upon determination of net landed weight and quality at New York. The Court emphasized practical factors disclosed by the record: copra naturally loses weight in transit; no bulk weigher was available in Manila so only gross weight less average tare could be obtained there; and the buyer had no agent in Manila to protect its interest during weighing. These facts supported construing the contract so that outturn weight at destination controlled final price.
Because NACOCO had the burden to prove that the shortage was explicable by risks of the voyage or reasonable weighing error and had not discharged that burden, the Court held that the net la
...continue reading
Case Syllabus (G.R. No. L-8717)
Parties and Procedural Posture
- General Foods Corporation was a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Delaware and licensed to do business in the Philippines and was the plaintiff and appellant.
- National Coconut Corporation was a corporation created by Commonwealth Act No. 518 and was the defendant and appellee, and it was later abolished and placed in liquidation by Executive Order No. 3727 dated November 24, 1950.
- The parties executed a sale contract dated September 23, 1947 for copra to be shipped CIF New York and governed by various shipping, weighing, sampling, and arbitration provisions.
- From November 14 to December 3, 1947 the appellee shipped copra on board the S.S. "Mindoro" and presented shipping documents enabling appellee to draw on appellant's letter of credit.
- Appellant filed suit in the Court of First Instance of Manila seeking recovery of $24,154.59 and related items after the Board of Liquidators refused to pay appellant's submitted claim against the appellee in liquidation.
- The Court of First Instance dismissed the complaint, and the appellant appealed to the Court, which rendered the decision now summarized.
Key Facts
- The original contract called for 1,500 tons (later reduced to 1,000) at a price of $164 per ton (later reduced to $163) CIF New York.
- Appellee shipped 1,054.6278 short tons of copra according to Manila weighing and tendered documents enabling withdrawal of 95 per cent of invoice value, amounting to $136,686.95.
- On arrival in New York the cargo was reweighed by appellant and found to be 898.792 short tons.
- Appellant received $8,092.02 from its insurer for 58.25 long tons lost or destroyed before loading and demanded from appellee the refund of $24,154.59 as the excess withdrawn under the letter of credit.
- Appellee, through its officer-in-charge Jose Nieva, Sr., acknowledged liability for the deficiency in outturn weight in a letter and promised payment when funds were available (Exhibit "B").
- The Board of Liquidators refused payment and the appellant pursued judicial recovery in the trial court.
Contract Terms
- The contract price was stated as CIF New York but expressly provided that "Net Landed Weights" were to govern and that the balance was to be ascertained based upon outturn weights and quality at port of discharge.
- The seller was given an option to deliver five per cent more or less with surplus or deficiency settled by specified rules and market-price adjustments beyond three per cent.
- The buyer agreed to open an irrevocable letter of credit through the Philippine National Bank for ninety-five per cent of invoice value in exchange for specified shipping documents.
- The contract contained a Clause Paramount making the published rules of the National Institute of Oilseeds Products part of the contract and an arbitration clause for disputes.
- The contract